Reducing Risk Through Real Options in Systems Design: The Case of Architecting a Maritime Domain Protection System

被引:35
作者
Buurman, Joost
Zhang, Stephen
Babovic, Vladan
机构
[1] Bangkok Bank Building
[2] #11-02/03 Bangkok Bank Building, Singapore 069546
关键词
Flexibility; maritime domain protection; real options analysis; systems design risk;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01160.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Complex engineering systems are usually designed to last for many years. Such systems will face many uncertainties in the future. Hence the design and deployment of these systems should not be based on a single scenario, but should incorporate flexibility. Flexibility can be incorporated in system architectures in the form of options that can be exercised in the future when new information is available. Incorporating flexibility comes, however, at a cost. To evaluate if this cost is worth the investment a real options analysis can be carried out. This approach is demonstrated through analysis of a case study of a previously developed static system-of-systems for maritime domain protection in the Straits of Malacca. This article presents a framework for dynamic strategic planning of engineering systems using real options analysis and demonstrates that flexibility adds considerable value over a static design. In addition to this it is shown that Monte Carlo analysis and genetic algorithms can be successfully combined to find solutions in a case with a very large number of possible futures and system designs.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 379
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Amram M., 1999, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
[2]  
Banlaoi R., 2005, BEST TIMES WORST TIM
[3]  
BARTOLOMEI J, 2006, P 16 ANN INT S INT C
[4]   A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments [J].
Benaroch, M ;
Kauffman, RJ .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (01) :70-86
[5]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[6]  
BORISON A, 2003, REAL OPT C WASH DC J
[7]  
BOURIAUX S, 2004, J RISK FINANCE, V5
[8]   OPTIONS - MONTE-CARLO APPROACH [J].
BOYLE, PP .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1977, 4 (03) :323-338
[9]  
Brandao L.E., 2005, DECIS ANAL, V2, P69, DOI DOI 10.1287/DECA.1050.0040
[10]   OPTION PRICING - SIMPLIFIED APPROACH [J].
COX, JC ;
ROSS, SA ;
RUBINSTEIN, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 7 (03) :229-263