Long-term follow-up of crush versus no crush technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions

被引:3
|
作者
Gao Zhan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang Yue-jin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen Ji-lin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qiao Shu-bin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Jian-jun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qin Xue-wen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yao Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu Yong-jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan Jin-qing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen Jue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu Hai-bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dai Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao Run-lin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Cardiol, Cardiovasc Inst, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fu Wai Hosp, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
关键词
percutaneous coronary intervention; drug eluting stent; bifurcation; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FINAL KISSING BALLOON; THROMBOSIS; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.06.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lesions at coronary bifurcations always are a big challenge for interventionists even with the advent of drug eluting stents (DES). Even as more clinical trials are published, operators still can not confirm that one strategy is more efficient than another. Selection of patients and short term follow-up contribute to the difficulty in comparing strategies. Methods From April 2004 to April 2008, 505 consecutive Chinese patients underwent DES implantation for true bifurcation lesions; including 258 using crush strategy (213 male, (56.7 +/- 10.8) years old) and 247 using no crush strategy (206 male, (58.1 +/- 10.1) years old) were analyzed. Results The follow-up period ranged from 237 to 1223 days, average (537 +/- 340) days for the crush group and (538 +/- 351) days for the no crush group. There was no significant difference of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate between the two groups (10.1% vs 12.1%; P=0.481), nor in cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or in the target vessel revascularization (TVR) (0.4% vs 1.6%; P=0.207, 2.7% vs 2.8; P=1.000 and 7.0% vs 7.7%; P=0.865). The stent thrombosis rate was similar in the two groups (1.6% vs 2.0%; P=0.409), late and very late stent thrombosis in both groups were very low (0.4% vs 0.4%; P=1.000). Seven-month angiographic follow-up showed no significant difference of the restenosis rate between the two groups (11.0% vs 13.5%; P=0.786). During the follow-up, cardiac death, nonfatal MI, TVR and ST free survival rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The only variant identified as a predictor of MACE was percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the first two years, which accounted for 47% of patients of all cases in four years. Conclusion Crush technique showed similar long-term clinical effect compared with other two DES techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions, the surgeons' skills are very important for reducing clinical events.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 631
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crush versus Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term follow-up
    Chen, En
    Cai, Wei
    Chen, Liang-long
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (14)
  • [2] Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions
    Zheng, Xu-Wei
    Zhao, Dong-Hui
    Peng, Hong-Yu
    Fan, Qian
    Ma, Qin
    Xu, Zhen-Ye
    Fan, Chao
    Liu, Li-Yu
    Liu, Jing-Hua
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (05) : 505 - 510
  • [3] DK crush technique: modified treatment of bifurcation lesions in coronary artery
    Chen, SL
    Ye, F
    Zhang, JJ
    Zhu, ZS
    Lin, S
    Shan, SJ
    Liu, ZZ
    Liu, Y
    Duan, BX
    Ge, JB
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 118 (20) : 1746 - 1750
  • [4] Long-Term Results After Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-Year Follow-Up Results
    Maeng, Michael
    Holm, Niels R.
    Erglis, Andrejs
    Kumsars, Indulis
    Niemela, Matti
    Kervinen, Kari
    Jensen, Jan S.
    Galloe, Anders
    Steigen, Terje K.
    Wiseth, Rune
    Narbute, Inga
    Gunnes, Pal
    Mannsverk, Jan
    Meyerdierks, Oliver
    Rotevatn, Svein
    Nikus, Kjell
    Vikman, Saila
    Ravkilde, Jan
    James, Stefan
    Aaroe, Jens
    Ylitalo, Antti
    Helqvist, Steffen
    Sjogren, Iwar
    Thayssen, Per
    Virtanen, Kari
    Puhakka, Mikko
    Airaksinen, Juhani
    Christiansen, Evald H.
    Lassen, Jens F.
    Thuesen, Leif
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [5] Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    Santoso, Teguh
    Zhang, Jun-Jie
    Ye, Fei
    Xu, Ya-Wei
    Fu, Qiang
    Kan, Jing
    Zhang, Feng-Fu
    Zhou, Yong
    Xie, Du-Jiang
    Kwan, Tak W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (02)
  • [6] Clinical Outcome After Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions The Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-Month Follow-Up Results
    Kervinen, Kari
    Niemela, Matti
    Romppanen, Hannu
    Erglis, Andrejs
    Kumsars, Indulis
    Maeng, Michael
    Holm, Niels R.
    Lassen, Jens F.
    Gunnes, Pal
    Stavnes, Sindre
    Jensen, Jan S.
    Galloe, Anders
    Narbute, Inga
    Sondore, Dace
    Christiansen, Evald H.
    Ravkilde, Jan
    Steigen, Terje K.
    Mannsverk, Jan
    Thayssen, Per
    Hansen, Knud Norregaard
    Helqvist, Steffen
    Vikman, Saila
    Wiseth, Rune
    Aaroe, Jens
    Jokelainen, Jari
    Thuesen, Leif
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (11) : 1160 - 1165
  • [7] Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions
    Zheng Xu-Wei
    Zhao Dong-Hui
    Peng Hong-Yu
    Fan Qian
    Ma Qin
    Xu Zhen-Ye
    Fan Chao
    Liu Li-Yu
    Liu Jing-Hua
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (05) : 505 - 510
  • [8] Very long-term follow-up of patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with bioresorbable scaffolds
    Iwanczyk, Sylwia
    Araszkiewicz, Aleksander
    Grygier, Marek
    Klotzka, Aneta
    Pyda, Malgorzata
    Skorupski, Wlodzimierz
    Mitkowski, Przemyslaw
    Lanocha, Magdalena
    Grajek, Stefan
    Drewnicki, Andrzej
    Mularek-Kubzdela, Tatiana
    Lesiak, Maciej
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 80 (03) : 307 - 314
  • [9] Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with double kissing crush technique compared to classical crush technique: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis
    Shan Shou-jie
    Ye Fei
    Liu Zhi-zhong
    Tian Nai-liang
    Zhang Jun-jie
    Chen Shao-liang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (07) : 1247 - 1251
  • [10] Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
    Moroni, Francesco
    Yeh, James Shue-Min
    Attallah, Antonious
    Santiago, Ricardo
    Martins Filho, Evandro
    Hall, Jack
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2022, 18 (01) : 71 - 82