Cardiovascular Benefits and Lipid Profile Changes 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

被引:25
作者
Voglino, Costantino [1 ]
Tirone, Andrea [1 ]
Ciuoli, Cristina [2 ]
Benenati, Nicoletta [2 ]
Paolini, Barbara [3 ]
Croce, Federica [4 ]
Gaggelli, Ilaria [1 ]
Vuolo, Maria Laura [1 ]
Cuomo, Roberto [5 ]
Grimaldi, Luca [5 ]
Vuolo, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, S Maria Scotte Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Unit Bariatr Surg, Siena, SI, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, S Maria Scotte Hosp, Dept Med Sci, Unit Endocrinol, Siena, SI, Italy
[3] Univ Siena, S Maria Scotte Hosp, Dept Innovat Expt & Clin Res, Unit Dietet & Clin Nutr, Siena, SI, Italy
[4] Osped Riuniti Valdichiana, Unit Diagnost Imaging, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Lab Med, Montepulciano, SI, Italy
[5] Univ Siena, S Maria Scotte Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Unit Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Siena, SI, Italy
关键词
Bariatric; Surgery; metabolic surgery; bariatric surgery; sleeve gastrectomy; RYGB bypass; bypass; VISCERAL ADIPOSE-TISSUE; WEIGHT-LOSS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; MORBID-OBESITY; INDEX; RISK; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-019-04482-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Visceral adipose tissue has been linked with cardiovascular events. Visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a routinely applicable tool for evaluation of visceral adipose dysfunction and linked to 10 year-cardiovascular risk. No previous studies have evaluated the changes over time of the VAI in patients who underwent different types of bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods We reviewed data of 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). VAI, lipid profile, and several anthropometric variables were measured before and after 5 years following surgery. Results During the studied time period, the BMI was similar between LSG and LRYGB patients (34.1 vs 31.6;p= 0.191), but the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) for LRYGB was significantly higher than LSG (31.3% vs 23.0%;p< 0.001). LRYGB patients had a significant improvement of all lipid parameters evaluated over time, while LSG patients experienced only a reduction in triglycerides (TG) levels and an increase in HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). VAI values were similar in the two groups at baseline as well at the last follow-up point (5-year VAI, LSG: 0.93, RYGB: 0.93;p= 0.951). At multivariate regression analysis, 5-year-%TWL was the only independent predictor of a greater amount of VAI reduction over time. Conclusion Bariatric surgery, independent of the type of surgical procedure, decreases the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks due to weight loss and improvement of lipid parameters. VAI could be a useful tool to better identify eligible patients for bariatric surgery and to determine the success of surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2722 / 2729
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective study of gut hormone and metabolic changes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Arakawa, Rachel
    Febres, Gerardo
    Cheng, Bin
    Krikhely, Abraham
    Bessler, Marc
    Korner, Judith
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [32] Imaging following bariatric surgery: roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy
    Clayton, Ryan D.
    Carucci, Laura R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1089)
  • [33] Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? A Multicenter Cohort Study
    Dijkhorst, Phillip J.
    Boerboom, Abel B.
    Janssen, Ignace M. C.
    Swank, Dingeman J.
    Wiezer, Rene M. J.
    Hazebroek, Eric J.
    Berends, Frits J.
    Aarts, Edo O.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (12) : 3834 - 3842
  • [34] Erosive Esophagitis after Bariatric Surgery: Banded Vertical Gastrectomy versus Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Soares Miguel, Gustavo Peixoto
    Moreira Coutinho Azevedo, Joao Luiz
    Oliveira de Souza, Paulo Henrique
    Neto, Joao de Siqueira
    Mustafa, Felipe
    Zambrana, Evelyn Saiter
    de Carvalho, Perseu Seixas
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [35] Concurrent bariatric surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Shada, Amber L.
    Stem, Miloslawa
    Funk, Luke M.
    Greenberg, Jacob A.
    Lidor, Anne O.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [36] Comparison of Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Lebanese Bariatric Surgical Practice
    Hanaa Dakour Aridi
    Georges Khazen
    Bassem Y. Safadi
    Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28 : 396 - 404
  • [37] Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy: Balancing the Risks of Surgery with the Benefits of Weight Loss
    Lager, Corey J.
    Esfandiari, Nazanene H.
    Subauste, Angela R.
    Kraftson, Andrew T.
    Brown, Morton B.
    Cassidy, Ruth B.
    Nay, Catherine K.
    Lockwood, Amy L.
    Varban, Oliver A.
    Oral, Elif A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (01) : 154 - 161
  • [38] Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch
    Homan, Jens
    Betzel, Bark
    Aarts, Edo O.
    van Laarhoven, Kees J. H. M.
    Janssen, Ignace M. C.
    Berends, Frits J.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (04) : 771 - 777
  • [39] Tailoring Bariatric Surgery: Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch
    Sudan, Ranjan
    Jain-Spangler, Kunoor
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (08): : 956 - 961
  • [40] Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Bone Density, and Bone Turnover After Bariatric Surgery: Differences Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy
    de Holanda, Narriane Chaves Pereira
    Baad, Vanessa Mayana Alves
    Bezerra, Louise Rayra
    de Lima, Silvane Katarine Medeiros
    Filho, Joao Modesto
    de Holanda Limeira, Caio Chaves
    Cavalcante, Taisy Cinthia Ferro
    Montenegro, Ana Carla Peres
    Bandeira, Francisco
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (12) : 5367 - 5375