Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement

被引:16
作者
Sargeant, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, A. M. [3 ]
Dohoo, I. R. [4 ]
Erb, H. N. [5 ]
Cevallos, M. [6 ]
Egger, M. [6 ]
Ersboll, A. K. [7 ]
Martin, S. W. [2 ]
Nielsen, L. R. [8 ]
Pearl, D. L. [2 ]
Pfeiffer, D. U. [9 ]
Sanchez, J. [10 ]
Torrence, M. E. [11 ]
Vigre, H. [12 ]
Waldner, C. [13 ]
Ward, M. P. [14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ctr Publ Hlth & Zoonoses, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Ames, IA USA
[4] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Ctr Vet Epidemiol Res, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Populat Med & Diagnost Sci, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Anim Welf & Dis Control, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Prod & Populat Hlth, London, England
[10] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Dept Hlth Management, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
[11] US FDA, Ctr Food Safety & Appl Nutr, College Pk, MD USA
[12] Tech Univ Denmark, Unit Genom Epidemiol, Natl Food Inst, Lyngby, Denmark
[13] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, Western Coll Vet Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[14] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Reporting guidelines; veterinary; observational study; animal; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; QUALITY; GUIDELINES; EXTENSION; TOOLS; LIVESTOCK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/zph.12314
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The reporting of observational studies in veterinary research presents many challenges that often are not adequately addressed in published reporting guidelines. A consensus meeting of experts was organized to develop an extension of the STROBE statement to address observational studies in veterinary medicine with respect to animal health, animal production, animal welfare and food safety outcomes. The consensus meeting was held 11-13 May 2014 in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Seventeen experts from North America, Europe and Australia attended the meeting. The experts were epidemiologists and biostatisticians, many of whom hold or have held editorial positions with relevant journals. Prior to the meeting, 19 experts completed a survey about whether they felt any of the 22 items of the STROBE statement should be modified and whether items should be added to address unique issues related to observational studies in animal species with health, production, welfare or food safety outcomes. At the meeting, the participants were provided with the survey responses and relevant literature concerning the reporting of veterinary observational studies. During the meeting, each STROBE item was discussed to determine whether or not re-wording was recommended, and whether additions were warranted. Anonymous voting was used to determine whether there was consensus for each item change or addition. The consensus was that six items needed no modifications or additions. Modifications or additions were made to the STROBE items numbered as follows: 1 (title and abstract), 3 (objectives), 5 (setting), 6 (participants), 7 (variables), 8 (data sources/measurement), 9 (bias), 10 (study size), 12 (statistical methods), 13 (participants), 14 (descriptive data), 15 (outcome data), 16 (main results), 17 (other analyses), 19 (limitations) and 22 (funding). Published literature was not always available to support modification to, or inclusion of, an item. The methods and processes used in the development of this statement were similar to those used for other extensions of the STROBE statement. The use of this extension to the STROBE statement should improve the reporting of observational studies in veterinary research related to animal health, production, welfare or food safety outcomes by recognizing the unique features of observational studies involving food-producing and companion animals, products of animal origin, aquaculture and wildlife.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 661
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Ravaud, Philippe
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (04) : 295 - 309
  • [2] Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
    da Costa, Bruno R.
    Cevallos, Myriam
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Egger, Matthias
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (01):
  • [3] Dohoo IR., 2012, Methods in epidemiologic research Charlottetown
  • [4] Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement
    Field, Nigel
    Cohen, Ted
    Struelens, Marc J.
    Palm, Daniel
    Cookson, Barry
    Glynn, Judith R.
    Gallo, Valentina
    Ramsay, Mary
    Sonnenberg, Pam
    MacCannell, Duncan
    Charlett, Andre
    Egger, Matthias
    Green, Jonathan
    Vineis, Paolo
    Abubakar, Ibrahim
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14 (04) : 341 - 352
  • [5] STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology - Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An extension of the STROBE statement
    Gallo, Valentina
    Egger, Matthias
    McCormack, Valerie
    Farmer, Peter B.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Kirsch-Volders, Micheline
    Matullo, Giuseppe
    Phillips, David H.
    Schoket, Bernadette
    Stromberg, Ulf
    Vermeulen, Roel
    Wild, Christopher
    Porta, Miquel
    Vineis, Paolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2012, 42 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [6] Poor Quality of Reporting Confounding Bias in Observational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Van Deursen, Anna M. M.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    Hak, Eelko
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (10) : 746 - 751
  • [7] Methodological quality assessment tools of non-experimental studies: a systematic review
    Jarde, Alexander
    Losilla, Josep-Maria
    Vives, Jaume
    [J]. ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2012, 28 (02): : 617 - 628
  • [8] Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement
    Little, Julian
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Moher, David
    Gagnon, France
    von Elm, Erik
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Cohen, Barbara
    Davey-Smith, George
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Scheet, Paul
    Gwinn, Marta
    Williamson, Robin E.
    Zou, Guang Yong
    Hutchings, Kim
    Johnson, Candice Y.
    Tait, Valerie
    Wiens, Miriam
    Golding, Jean
    van Duijn, Cornelia
    McLaughlin, John
    Paterson, Andrew
    Wells, George
    Fortier, Isabel
    Freedman, Matthew
    Zecevic, Maja
    King, Richard
    Infante-Rivard, Claire
    Stewart, Alex F. R.
    Birkett, Nick
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (01) : 37 - 55
  • [9] The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
    Moher, D
    Schulz, KF
    Altman, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9263) : 1191 - 1194
  • [10] Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
    Moher, David
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Simera, Iveta
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (02)