共 50 条
Levetiracetam in patients with central neuropathic post-stroke pain - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
被引:28
|作者:
Jungehulsing, G. J.
[1
,2
]
Israel, H.
[1
]
Safar, N.
[1
]
Taskin, B.
[1
]
Nolte, C. H.
[1
,2
]
Brunecker, P.
[2
]
Wernecke, K. -D.
[3
]
Villringer, A.
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Charite, Dept Neurol, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Ctr Stroke Res Berlin CSB, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite, Inst Med Biometry, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[4] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Leipzig, Germany
关键词:
antiepileptic drugs;
central pain;
levetiracetam;
neuropathic pain;
randomized clinical trial;
stroke;
EFNS GUIDELINES;
PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT;
PILOT;
TOLERABILITY;
RELIABILITY;
INVENTORY;
EFFICACY;
SV2A;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03857.x
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background and purpose: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a severe chronic neuropathic pain condition defined as a spontaneous pain or allodynia corresponding to a vascular lesion. It usually evolves weeks after stroke, and can distinctively impair the quality of life. Treatment is complex and mostly unsatisfactory. We hypothesized that the anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) improves CPSP compared with placebo. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and tolerability of LEV in patients with CPSP. Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design patients with CPSP lasting at least 3 months and a pain score >= 4 on the 11-point Likert scale were treated over two 8-week periods with a maximum dose up to 3000 mg LEV or placebo. Primary endpoint was a median pain lowering >= 2 in the final treatment week compared with the last baseline week. Secondary outcome measures comprised additional pain ratings, depression, sleep quality, quality of life and patients' global impression of change. Results: Of 42 patients, 33 [61.5 years (40-76); 38% women] completed the study. Side effects and withdrawals were more frequent in the LEV (n = 5) group than in the placebo group (n = 1). Patients treated with LEV did not show any improvement of pain or changes in secondary outcome parameters compared with placebo. Conclusions: LEV is not effective in treatment for CPSP. The mode of action of LEV does not exert an analgesic effect in chronic CPSP.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 337
页数:7
相关论文