Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels

被引:130
作者
Guggenberger, R. [1 ]
Winklhofer, S. [1 ]
Osterhoff, G. [2 ]
Wanner, G. A. [2 ]
Fortunati, M. [3 ]
Andreisek, G. [1 ]
Alkadhi, H. [1 ]
Stolzmann, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Spine Ctr, Thun, Switzerland
关键词
Metallic artefact reduction; Monoenergetic; Dual-energy computed tomography; Posterior spinal fusion implants; Postprocessing; LOW-BACK-PAIN; ORTHOPEDIC HARDWARE; MULTICHANNEL CT; INSTRUMENTATION; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-012-2501-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate optimal monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) settings for artefact reduction of posterior spinal fusion implants of various vendors and spine levels. Posterior spinal fusion implants of five vendors for cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine were examined ex vivo with single-energy (SE) CT (120 kVp) and DECT (140/100 kVp). Extrapolated monoenergetic DECT images at 64, 69, 88, 105 keV and individually adjusted monoenergy for optimised image quality (OPTkeV) were generated. Two independent radiologists assessed quantitative and qualitative image parameters for each device and spine level. Inter-reader agreements of quantitative and qualitative parameters were high (ICC = 0.81-1.00, kappa = 0.54-0.77). HU values of spinal fusion implants were significantly different among vendors (P < 0.001), spine levels (P < 0.01) and among SECT, monoenergetic DECT of 64, 69, 88, 105 keV and OPTkeV (P < 0.01). Image quality was significantly (P < 0.001) different between datasets and improved with higher monoenergies of DECT compared with SECT (V = 0.58, P < 0.001). Artefacts decreased significantly (V = 0.51, P < 0.001) at higher monoenergies. OPTkeV values ranged from 123-141 keV. OPTkeV according to vendor and spine level are presented herein. Monoenergetic DECT provides significantly better image quality and less metallic artefacts from implants than SECT. Use of individual keV values for vendor and spine level is recommended. aEuro cent Artefacts pose problems for CT following posterior spinal fusion implants. aEuro cent CT images are interpreted better with monoenergetic extrapolation using dual-energy (DE) CT. aEuro cent DECT extrapolation improves image quality and reduces metallic artefacts over SECT. aEuro cent There were considerable differences in monoenergy values among vendors and spine levels. aEuro cent Use of individualised monoenergy values is indicated for different metallic hardware devices.
引用
收藏
页码:2357 / 2364
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Dierks, Alexander
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Becker, Christoph R.
    Johnson, Thorsten R. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (07) : 1424 - 1429
  • [2] Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance
    Barrett, JF
    Keat, N
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (06) : 1679 - 1691
  • [3] Multichannel CT imaging of orthopedic hardware and implants
    Buckwalter, KA
    Parr, JA
    Choplin, RH
    Capello, WN
    [J]. SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 10 (01) : 86 - 97
  • [4] Clinical Guidelines and Payer Policies on Fusion for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    Lee, Michael J.
    Massicotte, Eric
    Ashman, Bryan
    Gruenberg, Marcelo
    Pilcher, Leslie E.
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) : S144 - S163
  • [5] Multichannel CT: Evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware
    Douglas-Akinwande, Annette C.
    Buckwalter, Kenneth A.
    Rydberg, Jonas
    Rankin, James L.
    Choplin, Robert H.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 : S97 - U107
  • [6] First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system
    Flohr, TG
    McCollough, CH
    Bruder, H
    Petersilka, M
    Gruber, K
    Süss, C
    Grasruck, M
    Stierstorfer, K
    Krauss, B
    Raupach, R
    Primak, AN
    Küttner, A
    Achenbach, S
    Becker, C
    Kopp, A
    Ohnesorge, BM
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) : 256 - 268
  • [7] CT SCANS THROUGH METAL SCANNING TECHNIQUE VERSUS HARDWARE COMPOSITION
    HARAMATI, N
    STARON, RB
    MAZELSPERLING, K
    FREEMAN, K
    NICKOLOFF, EL
    BARAX, C
    FELDMAN, F
    [J]. COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1994, 18 (06) : 429 - 434
  • [8] Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT
    Kachelriess, M
    Watzke, O
    Kalender, WA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) : 475 - 490
  • [9] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174
  • [10] Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT
    Lee, Mi-Jung
    Kim, Sungjun
    Lee, Sung-Ah
    Song, Ho-Taek
    Huh, Yong-Min
    Kim, Dae-Hong
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Suh, Jin-Suck
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (03) : 791 - 803