A Belief Revision Method Based On Argumentative Dialogue Model

被引:0
作者
Yin Deng [1 ]
Yong OuYang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
2016 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE & EDUCATION (ICCSE) | 2016年
关键词
certainty-factor based argumentative framework; argumentative dialog tree; belief revision; LOGIC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Belief is Agents' cognition of surrounding. Due to the dynamics of the environment, the new received belief may be conflicted with the original belief set when an agent got new information. Belief revision is to make sure the new belief set is a conflict-free set in this moment. This paper proposes a combined with debate way of belief revision, which use certainty-factor based argumentative framework to represent the uncertainty of knowledge and uncertainty reasoning, to get a belief set with the corresponding certainty factor. Finally the result belief set will be received by a setting certainty-factor threshold value. Proved by the experiment, the new accepted belief may not be included in the revised credible belief set, and credible belief set is conflict-free. Belief revision algorithm, therefore, have broken the traditional way of belief revision, and effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 562
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] ON THE LOGIC OF THEORY CHANGE - PARTIAL MEET CONTRACTION AND REVISION FUNCTIONS
    ALCHOURRON, CE
    GARDENFORS, P
    MAKINSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1985, 50 (02) : 510 - 530
  • [2] Amgoud L., BIPOLARITY ARGUMENTA
  • [3] [Anonymous], CRITIQUE PURE REASON
  • [4] AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks
    Baroni, Pietro
    Cerutti, Federico
    Giacomin, Massimiliano
    Guida, Giovanni
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2011, 52 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [5] Cayrol C., ACCEPTABILITY ARGUME
  • [6] On the logic of iterated belief revision
    Darwiche, A
    Pearl, J
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 89 (1-2) : 1 - 29
  • [7] ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ARGUMENTS AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND N-PERSON GAMES
    DUNG, PM
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 77 (02) : 321 - 357
  • [8] Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
    Dunne, Paul E.
    Hunter, Anthony
    McBurney, Peter
    Parsons, Simon
    Wooldridge, Michael
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 175 (02) : 457 - 486
  • [9] Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning
    Falappa, MA
    Kern-Isberner, G
    Simari, GR
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 141 (1-2) : 1 - 28
  • [10] Kakas AC, 1999, J LOGIC COMPUT, V9, P515, DOI 10.1093/logcom/9.4.515