Diagnostic Decision-Making and Strategies to Improve Diagnosis

被引:48
作者
Thammasitboon, Satid [1 ]
Cutrer, William B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Monroe Carell Jr Childrens Hosp Vanderbilt, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
COGNITIVE FORCING STRATEGIES; OPTION-GENERATION; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; ERRORS; PSYCHOLOGY; RATIONALITY; PERFORMANCE; EXPERTISE; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
A significant portion of diagnostic errors arises through cognitive errors resulting from inadequate knowledge, faulty data gathering, and/or faulty verification. Experts estimate that 75% of diagnostic failures can be attributed to clinician diagnostic thinking failure. The cognitive processes that underlie diagnostic thinking of clinicians are complex and intriguing, and it is imperative that clinicians acquire explicit appreciation and application of different cognitive approaches to make decisions better. A dual-process model that unifies many theories of decision-making has emerged as a promising template for understanding how clinicians think and judge efficiently in a diagnostic reasoning process. The identification and implementation of strategies for decreasing or preventing such diagnostic errors has become a growing area of interest and research. Suggested strategies to decrease diagnostic error incidence include increasing clinician's clinical expertise and avoiding inherent cognitive errors to make decisions better. Implementing Interventions focused solely on avoiding errors may work effectively for patient safety issues such as medication errors. Addressing cognitive errors, however, requires equal effort on expanding the individual clinician's expertise. Providing cognitive support to clinicians for robust diagnostic decision-making serves as the final strategic target for decreasing diagnostic errors. Clinical guidelines and algorithms offer another method for streamlining decision-making and decreasing likelihood of cognitive diagnostic errors. Addressing cognitive processing errors is undeniably the most challenging task in reducing diagnostic errors. While many suggested approaches exist, they are mostly based on theories and sciences in cognitive psychology, decision-making, and education. The proposed interventions are primarily suggestions and very few of them have been tested in the actual practice settings. Collaborative research effort is required to effectively address cognitive processing errors. Researchers in various areas, including patient safety/quality improvement, decision-making, and problem solving, must work together to make medical diagnosis more reliable.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Diagnostic error in internal medicine [J].
Graber, ML ;
Franklin, N ;
Gordon, R .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (13) :1493-1499
[22]  
Groopman J., 2007, How doctors think
[23]  
Henriksen K, 2005, DIAGNOSTIC FAILURE C
[24]  
Hogarth RM, 2005, ROUTINES OF DECISION MAKING, P67
[25]   Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices [J].
Johnson, JG ;
Raab, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 91 (02) :215-229
[26]   Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics [J].
Kahneman, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (05) :1449-1475
[27]   CHARACTERISTICS OF SKILLED OPTION GENERATION IN CHESS [J].
KLEIN, G ;
WOLF, S ;
MILITELLO, L ;
ZSAMBOK, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 62 (01) :63-69
[28]  
Klein G. A., 2017, Sources of power: How people make decisions
[29]  
Klein GA, 2011, 4 INT C CHIC IL OCT
[30]  
Montgomery K., 2006, How do doctors think: Clinical judgment and the practice of medicine