Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin Plus Tamsulosin OCAS in Men with Voiding and Storage Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Results from a Phase 2, Dose-finding Study (SATURN)

被引:51
作者
Van Kerrebroeck, Philip [1 ]
Haab, Francois [2 ]
Angulo, Javier C. [3 ]
Vik, Viktor [4 ]
Katona, Ferenc [5 ]
Garcia-Hernandez, Alberto [6 ]
Klaver, Monique [6 ]
Traudtner, Klaudia [6 ]
Oelke, Matthias [7 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Hop Tenon, F-75970 Paris, France
[3] Hosp Univ Getafe, Madrid, Spain
[4] Thomayer Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Josa Andras Hosp, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
[6] Astellas Pharma Europe BV, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Lower urinary tract symptoms; Overactive bladder; Tamsulosin OCAS; Solifenacin; Storage symptoms; Voiding symptoms; BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; URGENCY; RELIABILITY; PERCEPTION; TRIAL; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Storage symptoms are often undertreated in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Objective: To evaluate the combination of an antimuscarinic (solifenacin) with an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) versus tamsulosin alone in the treatment of men with LUTS. Design, setting, and participants: A double-blind, 12-wk, phase 2 study in 937 men with LUTS (>= 3 mo, total International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] >= 13, and maximum urinary flow rate 4.0-15.0 ml/s). Intervention: Eight treatment groups: tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) 0.4 mg; solifenacin 3, 6, or 9 mg; solifenacin 3, 6 or 9 mg plus tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg; or placebo. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in total IPSS. Secondary end points included micturition diary and quality-of-life (QoL) parameters. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed by severity of baseline storage symptoms, with statistical comparisons presented only for tamsulosin OCAS alone versus combination therapy, due to the small sample size of the solifenacin monotherapy and placebo subgroups. Results and limitations: Combination therapy was associated with significant improvements in micturition frequency and voided volume versus tamsulosin OCAS alone in the total study population; improvements in total IPSS were not significant. Statistically significant improvements in urgency episodes, micturition frequency, total urgency score, voided volume, IPSS storage subscore, IPSS-QoLindex, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition were observed in a subpopulation of men with two or more urgency episodes per 24 h (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 or 4) and eight or more micturitions per 24 h at baseline (storage symptoms subgroup) with combination therapy versus tamsulosin OCAS alone (p <= 0.05 for the dose-response slope, all variables). Combination therapy was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with the safety profiles of both compounds. Conclusions: Solifenacin plus tamsulosin OCAS did not significantly improve IPSS in the total study population but offered significant efficacy and QoL benefits over tamsulosin OCAS monotherapy in men with both voiding and storage symptoms at baseline. Combination therapy was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00510406 (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 407
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Combination treatment with an α-blocker plus an anticholinergic for bladder outlet obstruction:: A prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Athanasopoulos, A
    Gyftopoulos, K
    Giannitsas, K
    Fisfis, J
    Perimenis, P
    Barbalias, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 2253 - 2256
  • [2] The Role of Antimuscarinics in the Management of Men With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder Associated With Concomitant Bladder Outlet Obstruction: An Update
    Athanasopoulos, Anastasios
    Chapple, Christopher
    Fowler, Clare
    Gratzke, Christian
    Kaplan, Steven
    Stief, Christian
    Tubaro, Andrea
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (01) : 94 - 105
  • [3] Cardozo L, 2010, UROLOGY S3A, V76, P592
  • [4] Solifenacin in the treatment of urgency and other symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, rising-dose trial
    Cardozo, Linda
    Hessdoerfer, Elke
    Milani, Rodolfo
    Arano, Pedro
    Dewilde, Luc
    Slack, Mark
    Drogendijk, Ted
    Wright, Mark
    Bolodeoku, John
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 102 (09) : 1120 - 1127
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the patient's perception of intensity of urgency scale in overactive bladder
    Cartwright, Rufus
    Srikrishna, Sushma
    Cardozo, Linda
    Robinson, Dudley
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (10) : 1612 - 1617
  • [6] Tolterodine Treatment Improves Storage Symptoms Suggestive of Overactive Bladder in Men Treated With α-Blockers
    Chapple, Christopher
    Herschorn, Sender
    Abrams, Paul
    Sun, Franklin
    Brodsky, Marina
    Guan, Zhonghong
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (03) : 534 - 541
  • [7] A Comparison of the Frequencies of Medical Therapies for Overactive Bladder in Men and Women: Analysis of More Than 7.2 Million Aging Patients
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Evans, R. Mark
    McVary, Kevin T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (04) : 586 - 591
  • [8] Kaplan Steven A, 2007, Osteopath Med Prim Care, V1, P11, DOI 10.1186/1750-4732-1-11
  • [9] Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder - A randomized controlled trial
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Rovner, Eric S.
    Carlsson, Martin
    Bavendam, Tamara
    Guan, Zhonghong
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (19): : 2319 - 2328
  • [10] Add-on fesoterodine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men receiving a-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Gong, Jason
    Sun, Franklin
    Guan, Zhonghong
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (12) : 1831 - 1840