Analysis of the criteria for comparing Systems Engineering and agile methods

被引:2
|
作者
Humpert, Lynn [1 ]
Mundt, Enrik [1 ]
Bretz, Lukas [2 ]
Anacker, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Mechatron Syst Design, Dept Syst Engn, Paderborn, Germany
[2] Miele & Cie KG, Dept Syst Engn, Gutersloh, Germany
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE) | 2022年
关键词
Systems Engineering; agile methods; meta-criteria; comparison criteria;
D O I
10.1109/ISSE54508.2022.10005556
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Increasingly complex products and the resulting need for interdisciplinary development are challenges that should be focused on to ensure a company's competitiveness. Based on this, the development of new products and technologies related to for example sustainability and digitalization requires new approaches. Given this background, agile methods and Systems Engineering (SE) are experiencing great popularity. While there are first combined approaches, the fundamental differences and similarities between Agile and SE have not yet been adequately illuminated. To analyze these trends and tackle the challenges, the aim of this paper is to enable a qualified comparison of SE and agile methods. Therefore, we examine criteria to compare Agile and Systems Engineering approaches. First, a definition and discussion of both Systems Engineering and agile product development is given. An analysis of the literature has shown that a complete set of relevant comparison criteria between the two approaches does not exist. Therefore, a complete set of comparison criteria has been formed from the literature and the experience of experts. Ultimately, the criteria proposed in this paper create a basis for a subsequent comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ontological analysis, evaluation and engineering of business systems analysis methods
    Green, P
    Rosemann, M
    JOURNAL OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 15 (02) : I - II
  • [42] An Investigation into Agile Methods in Embedded Systems Development
    Albuquerque, Caroline Oliveira
    Antonino, Pablo Oliveira
    Nakagawa, Elisa Yumi
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2012, PT III, 2012, 7335 : 576 - 591
  • [43] Criteria for comparing computed and observed results in geotechnical engineering
    Cherubini, C
    Orr, TLL
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1243 - 1247
  • [44] Towards Agile Engineering of High-Integrity Systems
    Paige, Richard F.
    Charalambous, Ramon
    Ge, Xiaocheng
    Brooke, Phillip J.
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5219 : 30 - +
  • [45] Systems Engineering Isn't Scary for Agile Practitioners
    Wozniak, Michael
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2023, 33 (01) : 1627 - 1639
  • [46] 8.4.2 Fundamentals of Agile Systems Engineering – Part 2
    Dove, Rick
    LaBarge, Ralph
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2014, 24 (01) : 876 - 892
  • [47] The Agile Enterprise: Systems Engineering Agility at the Enterprise Level
    Brown, Don E. (Don.E.Brown.II@thesiorg.com), 1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (23):
  • [48] Methods Agile and Methodology A plus S in the teaching of Software Engineering
    Cornejo Elgueta, Jorge
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATICA (ICA-ACCA), 2016,
  • [49] ENGINEERING METHODS FOR THE APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF RADIO SYSTEMS.
    Zaidel, S.M.
    Telecommunications and Radio Engineering (English translation of Elektrosvyaz and Radiotekhnika), 1979, 33-34 (09): : 58 - 63
  • [50] Adaptive numerical methods for dynamic analysis of engineering systems
    Rao, NSVK
    Rao, RV
    COMPUTER METHODS AND ADVANCES IN GEOMECHANICS, VOL 1, 1997, : 439 - +