Comprehensive and subacute care interventions improve health-related quality of life for older patients after surgery for hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial

被引:33
作者
Shyu, Yea-Ing L. [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Jersey [3 ,4 ]
Tseng, Ming-Yueh [5 ]
Li, Hsiao-Juan [1 ]
Wu, Chi-Chuan [6 ]
Cheng, Huey-Shinn [7 ]
Chou, Shih-Wei [8 ]
Chen, Ching-Yen [9 ]
Yang, Ching-Tzu [10 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Nursing, Coll Med, Tao Yuan 33302, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Hlth Aging Res Ctr, Tao Yuan 33302, Taiwan
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Gerontol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] MeiHo Univ, Dept Nursing, Pingtung, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Traumatol Div, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[8] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[9] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Sect Gen Psychiat, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[10] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Tao Yuan 33302, Taiwan
关键词
Comprehensive care; Health-related quality of life; Hip fracture; Subacute care; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTION; DEPRESSION; OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; TAIWANESE; RECOVERY; SF-36; RISK; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.020
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Elderly patients with hip fracture have been found to benefit from subacute care interventions that usually comprise usual care with added geriatric intervention, early rehabilitation, and supported discharge. However, no studies were found on the effects of combining subacute care and health-maintenance interventions on health outcomes for elders with hip fracture. Objectives: To compare the effects of an interdisciplinary comprehensive care programme with those of subacute care and usual care programmes on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for elderly patients with hip fracture. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Settings: A 3000-bed medical centre in northern Taiwan. Participants: Patients with hip fracture (N=299) were randomised into three groups: subacute care (n = 101), comprehensive care (n = 99), and usual care (n = 99). Methods: Subacute care included geriatric consultation, continuous rehabilitation, and discharge planning. Comprehensive care consisted of subacute care plus health-maintenance interventions to manage depressive symptoms, manage malnutrition, and prevent falls. Usual care included only 1-2 in-hospital rehabilitation sessions, discharge planning without environmental assessment, no geriatric consultation, and no in-home rehabilitation. HRQoL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Taiwan version at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Results: Participants in the comprehensive care group improved more in physical function, role physical, general health and mental health than those in the usual care group. The subacute care group had greater improvement in physical function, role physical, vitality, and social function than the usual care group. The intervention effects for both comprehensive and subacute care increased over time, specifically from 6 months after hip fracture onward, and reached a maximum at 12 months following discharge. Conclusions: Both comprehensive care and subacute care programmes may improve health outcomes of elders with hip fracture. Our results may provide a reference for health care providers in countries using similar programmes with Chinese/Taiwanese immigrant populations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1024
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Adunsky A, 2003, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V58, P542
[2]  
Allegrante John P, 2007, HSS J, V3, P63, DOI 10.1007/s11420-006-9036-x
[3]   Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Binder, EF ;
Brown, M ;
Sinacore, DR ;
Steger-May, K ;
Yarasheski, KE ;
Schechtman, KB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07) :837-846
[4]   Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference [J].
Bjorner, Jakob B. ;
Wallenstein, Gene V. ;
Martin, Marie C. ;
Lin, Peggy ;
Blaisdell-Gross, Bonnie ;
Piech, Catherine Tak ;
Mody, Samir H. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (04) :731-739
[5]   Selection of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip Fracture [J].
Bryant, Dianne M. ;
Sanders, David W. ;
Coles, Chad P. ;
Petrisor, Brad A. ;
Jeray, Kyle J. ;
Laflamme, George Yves .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (06) :434-441
[6]  
Burke W J, 1991, J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, V4, P173, DOI 10.1177/089198879100400310
[7]  
Chen Y. J., 1995, REV PROPOSAL PATIENT
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]   Rehabilitation interventions for improving physical and psychosocial functioning after hip fracture in older people [J].
Crotty, Maria ;
Unroe, Kathleen ;
Cameron, Ian D. ;
Miller, Michelle ;
Ramirez, Gilbert ;
Couzner, Leah .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01)
[10]   Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation [J].
Dhanwal, Dinesh K. ;
Dennison, Elaine M. ;
Harvey, Nick C. ;
Cooper, Cyrus .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 45 (01) :15-22