Surrogate model-based strategy for cryogenic cavitation model validation and sensitivity evaluation

被引:49
作者
Goel, Tushar [2 ]
Thakur, Siddharth [2 ]
Haftka, Raphael T. [2 ]
Shyy, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, Jinhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cavitation; code validation; cryogenics; multiple surrogates; global sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1002/fld.1779
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The study of cavitation dynamics in cryogenic environment has critical implications for the performance and safety of liquid rocket engines, but there is no established method to estimate cavitation-induced loads. To help develop Such a computational capability, we employ a multiple-surrogate model-based approach to aid in the model validation and calibration process of a transport-based, homogeneous cryogenic cavitation model. We assess the role of empirical parameters in the cavitation model and uncertainties in material properties via global sensitivity analysis coupled with multiple surrogates including polynomial response surface, radial basis neural network, kriging, and a predicted residual sum of squares-based weighted average surrogate model. The global sensitivity analysis results indicate that the performance of cavitation model is more sensitive to the changes in model parameters than to uncertainties in material properties. Although the impact of uncertainty in temperature-dependent vapor pressure on the predictions seems significant, uncertainty in latent heat influences only temperature field. The influence of wall heat transfer on pressure load is insignificant. We find that slower onset of vapor condensation leads to deviation of the predictions front the experiments. The recalibrated model parameters rectify the importance of evaporation source terms, resulting in significant improvements in pressure predictions. The model parameters need to be adjusted for different fluids, but for a given fluid, they help capture the essential fluid physics with different geometry and operating conditions. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 1007
页数:39
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M, 1972, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS, P885
[2]   Simulations of cavitating flows using hybrid unstructured meshes [J].
Ahuja, V ;
Hosangadi, A ;
Arunajatesan, S .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (02) :331-340
[3]  
AIAA, 1994, AIAA JURAL, V32, P3, DOI DOI 10.2514/3.48281.TA4DEXPERIME4TALU4CA(1)
[4]  
AIAA computational fluid dynamics committee, 1998, Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations Technical Report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, CR2242 NASA
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 33 AIAA FLUID DYN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1963, ECON GEOL, DOI [DOI 10.2113/GSECONGEO.58.8.1246, 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1956, J FLUIDS ENG, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.4014152
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HYDRODYNAMICS PUMPS
[10]  
*ASME ED BOARD, 1994, ASME, V116, P797