Validity of Postpartum Depression Screening Across Socioeconomic Groups: A Review of the Construct and Common Screening Tools

被引:14
作者
King, Patricia Ann Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Social Work, Los Angeles, CA 90015 USA
关键词
Postpartum depression; psychometrics; bias; socioeconomic status; LOW-INCOME WOMEN; POSTNATAL DEPRESSION; SCALE; PREVALENCE; MOTHERS; METAANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTS; SYMPTOMS; ANXIETY; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;
D O I
10.1353/hpu.2012.0163
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This integrative literature review evaluates the construct validity and potential for bias of commonly used postpartum depression screening tools in women with low socioeconomic status. Multiple search strategies were applied to identify literature addressing the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and Postpartum Depression Screening Scale from January 1980 thru January 2010. Twenty articles were identified, eight of which explicitly included women with low-socioeconomic status. Only three of these articles directly evaluated construct validity. The screening tools reviewed lack the comprehensive psychometric evaluation needed to support their extensive use across socioeconomically diverse populations that may result in missed opportunities to identify postpartum depression. This issue stems from serious limitations in the understanding of postpartum depression itself. An alternate understanding of and approach to screening for depression across all women in their developmental and environmental context is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1456
页数:26
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   An international study exploring levels of postpartum depressive symptomatology [J].
Affonso, DD ;
De, AK ;
Horowitz, JA ;
Mayberry, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) :207-216
[2]  
Amankwaa Linda Clark, 2003, Issues Ment Health Nurs, V24, P297, DOI 10.1080/01612840305283
[3]  
Anastasia A, 1997, Psychological testing, V7th
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001134.PUB2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 8 HARV U CTR DEV CHI, V8
[7]  
Beck A.T., 1996, Manual for the BDI-II, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00742-000
[8]  
BECK CT, 1992, NURS RES, V41, P166
[9]  
BECK CT, 1993, NURS RES, V42, P42
[10]   Comparative analysis of the performance of the postpartum depression screening scale with two other depression instruments [J].
Beck, CT ;
Gable, RK .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2001, 50 (04) :242-250