The Study Demands-Resources Framework: An Empirical Introduction

Based on the well-established job demands-resources (JD-R) framework, in our study we introduce the novel study demands-resources (SD-R) framework. The SD-R framework allows the study of salutogenic and pathogenic effects of university settings on students' health and well-being. Using a large sample of university students (n= 5660), our aim was to translate and validate the JD-R's essential assumptions within the university context, and thus establish the SD-R framework. We performed structural equation modelling to examine these essential assumptions. As assumed, we found that study demands-the "bad things" at university-predict student burnout (beta = 0.50), whereas study resources-the "good things" at university-predict student engagement (beta = 0.70) as well as burnout (beta = -0.35). Also, in line with the SD-R's assumptions, student burnout predicts life satisfaction negatively (beta = -0.34), whereas student engagement predicts life satisfaction positively (beta = 0.29). Hence, we were able to introduce the novel SD-R framework and validate its core assumptions. The SD-R framework serves as an excellent theoretical basis to examine both the salutogenic and pathogenic effects of the study context on students' health and well-being. However, the framework needs further longitudinal and meta-analytical verification in accordance with the research on the JD-R framework.