Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE

被引:16
作者
Abdelhadi, Yazeed [1 ]
Dulaimi, Mohammed Fadhil [2 ]
Bajracharya, Arun [3 ]
机构
[1] Riverside Ctr, Delay Expert Serv, HKA, Level 35,123 Eagle St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Leeds Beckett Univ, Sch Built Environm & Engn, Leeds LS2 8AJ, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Heriot Watt Univ Malaysia, Sch Energy Geosci Infrastruct & Soc, Putrajaya, Malaysia
关键词
Delay analysis methods; selection of DAMs; construction projects; qualitative data; UAE;
D O I
10.1080/15623599.2018.1435155
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Several delay analysis methods (DAMs) have been developed and used in the construction industry in order to analyse the causes and effects of delay events. In this research, a number of commonly used DAMs, in the specific context of UAE, are investigated by exploring the factors influencing their selection decisions as well as the process of making such a decision. A total of eight expert respondents from five different projects in the UAE were selected who provided critical insight into the decision-making process adopted in practice to select a DAM. The individual project case analysis as well as the cross case analysis helped to identify a number of factors that influence the selection of DAMs in UAE projects. Some of the main identified factors were the attitude of the client, experience of the delay analyst, reputation and impartiality of the delay analyst, complexity of the project, and cost and timing of performing the analysis. The research argues that such an important decision process that can have a serious impact on the success of a commercial venture requires individual organizations to develop and adopt clear guidelines on how such decisions are made to protect its commercial interests.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 340
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AACEI, 2011, FOR SCHED AN REC PRA
[2]  
Alkass S., 1995, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V13, P335, DOI DOI 10.1080/01446199500000038
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Arabian Business
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INT J PROJECT MANAGE, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010
[5]   Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims [J].
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Construction Engineering and Management Program, 3201 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60616, United States .
Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2006, 2 (145-155) :145-155
[6]  
Avalon A, 2017, COST ENG J, V59, P12
[7]   Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methodologies [J].
Braimah, Nuhu ;
Ndekugri, Issaka .
International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26 (08) :789-799
[8]   Comparison of delay analysis methodologies [J].
Bubshait, AA ;
Cunningham, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1998, 124 (04) :315-322
[9]  
D'Onofrio R., 2015, COST ENG, V57, P4
[10]  
Denzin N., 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, P3