Mobile applications for pain management: an app analysis for clinical usage

被引:75
作者
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Yoo, Illhoi [1 ,2 ]
Lancey, Robert [3 ]
Varghese, Ebby [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Informat Inst, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Sch Med, Five Hosp Dr,CE718 Clin Support & Educ Bldg DC006, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
Pain management; Chronic pain; Mobile applications; Mobile devices; UNITED-STATES; SMARTPHONE-APPLICATIONS; PRIMARY-CARE; PREVALENCE; USABILITY; LITERACY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-019-0827-7
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pain is the most common and distressing symptom for patients in all clinical settings. The dearth of health informatics tools to support acute and chronic pain management may be contributing to the chronic pain and opioid abuse crises. The purpose of this study is to qualitatively evaluate the content and functionality of mobile pain management apps. Methods: The Apple App Store and the Google Play Store were searched to identify pain management apps. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) that apps include a pain diary function allowing users to record pain episodes, (2) are available in either Apple App Store or Google Play Store, and (3) are available in the English language. We excluded apps if they were limited to only specific forms of pain or specific diseases. Results: A total of 36 apps met the inclusion criteria. Most of the apps served as pain diary tools to record the key characteristics of pain. The pain diary features of the apps were grouped into nine categories: the recordings of pain intensity, pain location, pain quality, pain's impacts on daily life, other features of pain, other related symptoms, medication, patients' habits and basic information, and other miscellaneous functions. The apps displayed various problems in use. The problem of not involving healthcare professionals in app development has not been resolved. Approximately 31% of apps including a pain diary function engaged clinicians in app development. Only 19% involved end-users in development and then only in an ad-hoc way. Only one third of the apps supported the cross-platforms, none of the apps supported clinician access to graphical pain data visualization, none secured HIPAA compliance, and none endorsed the PEG tool for primary care physicians' chronic pain management. Conclusions: Most of the 36 pain management apps demonstrated various problems including user interface and security. Many apps lacked clinician and end-user involvement in app development impacting the clinical utility of these apps. We could not find any pain apps suitable for clinical usage despite high demand from clinicians due to the US opioid crisis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J PAIN, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JPAIN.2011.02.034
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, EFFECT CANC QUALITY
[3]  
Apple, App store
[4]   Cancer Pain Prevalence and its Management [J].
Arslan, Deniz ;
Koca, Timur ;
Akar, Emre ;
Tural, Deniz ;
Ozdogan, Mustafa .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (20) :8557-8562
[5]  
Center for Disease Control, 2016, DRUG OV DEATH DAT
[6]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[7]   CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain-United States, 2016 [J].
Dowell, Deborah ;
Haegerich, Tamara M. ;
Chou, Roger .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (15) :1624-1645
[8]   The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States [J].
Gaskin, Darrell J. ;
Richard, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 13 (08) :715-724
[9]  
Google, PLAY STOR
[10]   An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review [J].
Gregory, Julie ;
McGowan, Linda .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2016, 25 (5-6) :583-598