Cost-effectiveness of second-line diagnostic investigations in patients included in the DANTE trial: a randomized controlled trial of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography

被引:4
作者
Lopci, Egesta [1 ]
Castello, Angelo [1 ]
Morenghi, Emanuela [2 ]
Tanzi, Dario [5 ]
Cavuto, Silvio [7 ]
Lutman, Fabio [3 ]
Chiesa, Giuseppe [8 ]
Vanni, Elena [4 ,6 ]
Alloisio, Marco [5 ,6 ]
Infante, Maurizio [9 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Rozzano, Italy
[2] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Rozzano, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rozzano, Italy
[4] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Thorac Surg, Rozzano, Italy
[5] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Management & Operat Control Unit, Rozzano, Italy
[6] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[7] Azienda Unita Sanit Locale IRCCS, Res & Stat Infrastruct, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[8] Humanitas Gavazzeni, Dept Thorac Surg, Bergamo, Italy
[9] AIOU, Dept Thorac Surg, Verona, Italy
关键词
computed tomography-guided biopsy; cost-effectiveness; diagnostic performance; lung cancer screening; lung nodule; PET; CT; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; FDG-PET; F-18-FDG PET; CT; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY; ENHANCEMENT; VALIDATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000993
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study was to analyze the economic efficiency of second-line diagnostic investigations in patients with undetermined lung nodules. Participants and methods A retrospective review of all surgical cases included in the DANTE trial from 2001 to 2006 for lung cancer screening was performed. Overall, 217 patients and 261 lung nodules were analyzed. The cohort was divided into patients investigated with PET and/or computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (PET-CTB protocol; N=100), compared with those assessed with serial low-dose CT scans (standard protocol; N=161). Outpatient's and inpatient's costs were expressed in euros and derived from the Italian National Health Service. Ineffective costs were defined as the cost of procedures that lead to avoidable surgical intervention. Results The diagnostic accuracy of the two protocols was 91% for the standard (sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 26%, and negative predictive value 100%) and 90% for the PET-CTB protocol (sensitivity 98%, specificity 81%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 97%). Average costs for outpatient's diagnostics were 694 and 1.462 euros, respectively, for the standard and PET-CTB protocol. Average inpatient's costs for both protocols were 12.121 euros. The two protocols showed comparable effectiveness in terms of outpatient's costs (94 and 90%, respectively; P=0.252). Inpatient's costs were effective in 36% of cases monitored according to the standard protocol compared with 85% of patients investigated with PET-CTB protocol. Ineffective costs corresponded to 64 and 15%, respectively (P<0.0001). Conclusion Despite a higher average cost for outpatient's diagnostics, the implementation of PET imaging with or without CT-guided needle biopsy in the workup of suspicious lung nodules results in reduced unnecessary harm and costs related to inpatient's procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 516
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Adams, Amanda M.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Black, William C.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) : 395 - 409
  • [2] [Anonymous], IARC CANCERBASE
  • [3] Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning
    Ashraf, H.
    Dirksen, A.
    Loft, A.
    Bertelsen, A. K.
    Bach, K. S.
    Hansen, H.
    Pedersen, J. H.
    Mortensen, J.
    [J]. THORAX, 2011, 66 (04) : 315 - 319
  • [4] Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review
    Bach, Peter B.
    Mirkin, Joshua N.
    Oliver, Thomas K.
    Azzoli, Christopher G.
    Berry, Donald A.
    Brawley, Otis W.
    Byers, Tim
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Jett, James R.
    Sabichi, Anita L.
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Wood, Douglas E.
    Qaseem, Amir
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22): : 2418 - 2429
  • [5] Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography
    Bastarrika, G
    García-Velloso, MJ
    Lozano, MD
    Montes, U
    Torre, W
    Spiteri, N
    Campo, A
    Seijo, L
    Alcaide, AB
    Pueyo, J
    Cano, D
    Vivas, I
    Cosín, O
    Domínguez, P
    Serra, P
    Richter, JA
    Montuenga, L
    Zulueta, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 171 (12) : 1378 - 1383
  • [6] British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules
    Callister, M. E. J.
    Baldwin, D. R.
    Akram, A. R.
    Barnard, S.
    Cane, P.
    Draffan, J.
    Franks, K.
    Gleeson, F.
    Graham, R.
    Malhotra, P.
    Prokop, M.
    Rodger, K.
    Subesinghe, M.
    Waller, D.
    Woolhouse, I.
    [J]. THORAX, 2015, 70 : 1 - 54
  • [7] Comparison of CT and PET/CT for biopsy guidance in oncological patients
    Cerci, Juliano J.
    Tabacchi, Elena
    Bogoni, Mateos
    Delbeke, Dominique
    Pereira, Carlos Cunha
    Cerci, Rodrigo J.
    Krauzer, Cassiano
    Sakamoto, Danielle Giacometti
    Fanti, Stefano
    Vitola, Joao Vicente
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (08) : 1269 - 1274
  • [8] Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule:: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT
    Christensen, Jared A.
    Nathan, Mark A.
    Mullan, Brian P.
    Hartman, Thomas E.
    Swensen, Stephen J.
    Lowe, Val J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (05) : 1361 - 1367
  • [9] Solitary pulmonary nodules: Impact of quantitative contrast-enhanced CT on the cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET
    Comber, LA
    Keith, CJ
    Griffiths, M
    Miles, KA
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (09) : 706 - 711
  • [10] The Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Lung Cancer Screening and Drivers of Program Efficiency
    Cressman, Sonya
    Peacock, Stuart J.
    Tammemagi, Martin C.
    Evans, William K.
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    Goffin, John R.
    Tremblay, Alain
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Manos, Darla
    MacEachern, Paul
    Bhatia, Rick
    Puksa, Serge
    Nicholas, Garth
    McWilliams, Annette
    Mayo, John R.
    Yee, John
    English, John C.
    Pataky, Reka
    McPherson, Emily
    Atkar-Khattra, Sukhinder
    Johnston, Michael R.
    Schmidt, Heidi
    Shepherd, Frances A.
    Soghrati, Kam
    Amjadi, Kayvan
    Burrowes, Paul
    Couture, Christian
    Sekhon, Harmanjatinder S.
    Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
    Goss, Glenwood
    Ionescu, Diana N.
    Hwang, David M.
    Martel, Simon
    Sin, Don D.
    Tan, Wan C.
    Urbanski, Stefan
    Xu, Zhaolin
    Tsao, Ming-Sound
    Lam, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (08) : 1210 - 1222