Low Doses of Controlled-Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Late-Life Depression: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

被引:29
作者
Rapaport, Mark Hyman [1 ]
Lydiard, Bruce [2 ]
Pitts, Cornelius D. [3 ]
Schaefer, Desiree [3 ]
Bartolic, Edward I. [4 ]
Iyengar, Malini [3 ]
Carfagno, Michelle [3 ]
Lipschitz, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] SE Hlth Consultants LLC, Charleston, SC USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, King Of Prussia, PA USA
[4] i3 Res, Basking Ridge, NJ USA
关键词
SEROTONIN-REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PRIMARY-CARE; EFFICACY; TOLERABILITY; COMMUNITY; ANXIETY; NORTRIPTYLINE; FLUOXETINE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.06m02996
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low daily (loses of controlled-release (CR) paroxetine in patients with late-life depression. Method: This was a 10-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, fixed-dose trial randomly assigning patients >= 60 years old to daily doses of paroxetine CR 12.5 mg (N = 168), paroxetine CR 25 mg (N = 177), or placebo (N = 180). Patients had major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total scores of 18. The primary efficacy variable was the chance from baseline to study endpoint in total HAM-D scores. The study was conducted from June 2003 to October 2004. Results: The drug/placebo difference in HAM-D change from baseline at study endpoint was -1.8 (95% CI = -3.41 to -0.19, p = .029) for paroxetine CR 12.5 mg, and -3.3 (95% CI = -4.84 to -1.68, p <.001) for paroxetine CR 25 mg. A significantly larger percentage of patients achieved remission (HAM-D total score : 7 at endpoint) with paroxetine CR 25 mg (41%). but not with 12.5 mg (31%), as compared with placebo (28%) (p = .008). Both doses of paroxetine CR also achieved statistical significance compared to placebo for the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (p < .01) and the patient-rated measures of depression severity (p < .05) and quality of life (p <= .001). Both active treatments were generally well tolerated, with adverse event withdrawal rates of 6%, 8%, and 7% for paroxetine CR 12.5 mg, paroxetine CR 25 mg, and placebo, respectively. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that paroxetine CR 12.5 mg and 25 mg daily are efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients ! 60 years of age, although effect sizes are relatively smaller with the 12.5 mg/day dose.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 57
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression rating scale-seasonal affective disorder version (SIGH-SAD)
[2]   Comparison of sertraline and nortriptyline in the treatment of major depressive disorder in late life [J].
Bondareff, W ;
Alpert, M ;
Friedhoff, AJ ;
Richter, EM ;
Clary, CM ;
Batzar, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 157 (05) :729-736
[3]   Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bruce, ML ;
Ten Have, TR ;
Reynolds, CF ;
Katz, II ;
Schulberg, HC ;
Mulsant, BH ;
Brown, GK ;
McAvay, GJ ;
Pearson, JL ;
Alexopoulos, GS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (09) :1081-1091
[4]  
DeVane C Lindsay, 2003, Psychopharmacol Bull, V37 Suppl 1, P29
[5]  
DUNNER DL, 1992, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V53, P21
[6]   AN OVERVIEW OF PAROXETINE IN THE ELDERLY [J].
DUNNER, DL .
GERONTOLOGY, 1994, 40 :21-27
[7]  
ENDICOTT J, 1993, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V29, P321
[8]  
FEIGHNER JP, 1985, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V46, P20
[9]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[10]   Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release and immediate-release paroxetine in the treatment of depression [J].
Golden, RN ;
Nemeroff, CB ;
McSorley, P ;
Pitts, CD ;
Dubé, EM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (07) :577-584