Exploring utility organization electricity generation, residential electricity consumption, and energy efficiency: A climatic approach

被引:30
作者
Craig, Christopher A. [1 ]
Feng, Song [2 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, 202 McDonald Hall,1500 Univ Dr, Billings, MT 59101 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Gearhart Dept Geosci 228, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Electricity; Energy efficiency; Utility; Climate; Generation; Efficiency; Climate change; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; UNITED-STATES; TEMPERATURE; PERCEPTIONS; EMISSIONS; DEMAND; MARKET; IMPACTS; WEATHER; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.101
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study examined the impact of electricity generation by fuel source type and electricity consumption on carbon emissions to assess the role of climatic variability and energy efficiency (EE) in the United States. Despite high levels of greenhouse gas emissions, residential electricity consumption continues to increase in the United States and fossil fuels are the primary fuel source of electricity generation. 97.2% of the variability in carbon emissions in the electricity industry was explained by electricity generation from coal and residential electricity consumption. The relationships between residential electricity consumption, short-term climatic variability, long-term climatic trends, short-term reduction in electricity from EE programs, and long-term trends in EE programs was examined. This is the first study of its nature to examine these relationships across the 48 contiguous United States. Inter-year and long-term trends in cooling degree days, or days above a baseline temperature, were the primary climatic drivers of residential electricity consumption. Cooling degree days increased across the majority of the United States during the study period, and shared a positive relationship with residential electricity consumption when findings were significant. The majority of electricity reduction from EE programs was negatively related to residential electricity consumption where findings were significant. However, the trend across the majority of states was a decrease in electricity reduction from EE while residential electricity consumption increased. States that successfully reduced consumption are discussed, in addition to the potential use of communication theory to design interventions aimed at improving EE program success. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 790
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abrahamse W, 2011, HUM ECOL REV, V18, P30
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Behavior and Energy Policy [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Mullainathan, Sendhil .
SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5970) :1204-1205
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR
[5]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[6]  
Asensio OI, 2015, PNAS
[7]  
Bresler S, 2013, ENERGY EFFICIENCY: TOWARDS THE END OF DEMAND GROWTH, P419, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397879-0.00016-5
[8]   Affective influences on energy-related decisions and behaviors [J].
Brosch, Tobias ;
Patel, Martin K. ;
Sander, David .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2014,
[9]   Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems [J].
Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd ;
van den Broek, Machteld ;
Seebregts, Ad ;
Faaij, Andre .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 156 :107-128
[10]   Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people's energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters [J].
Chen, Mei-Fang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :1746-1753