A framework for the probabilistic quantification of the resilience of communities to hurricane winds

被引:23
作者
Abdelhady, Ahmed U. [1 ]
Spence, Seymour M. J. [1 ]
McCormick, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hurricanes; Community resilience; Monte Carlo simulation; Residential communities; VULNERABILITY; RISK; DEFINITIONS; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104376
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Enhancing community resilience against hurricanes, one of the costliest natural hazards to impact the United States over the past four decades, is an essential requirement for the nation's security and welfare. A fundamental step in this direction is to provide computational frameworks that are able to quantify the response of the community to the hazard immediately after its impact and during its recovery process. Existing frameworks focus on estimating damage and losses immediately subsequent to the hurricane impact through vulnerability models. This paper provides a framework that integrates damage estimated from vulnerability models with a probabilistic recovery model for quantifying community resilience against hurricanes. The framework is based on five resilience limit states that identify the required recovery activities for each building based on the amount of damage. A building-level recovery model, based on discrete functionality states, translates these limit states to a building-level recovery function. By aggregating building recovery functions, a community recovery function and resilience measure are obtained. The framework is embedded in a Monte Carlo simulation strategy for uncertainty propagation therefore enabling a fully probabilistic quantification of community resilience. The framework is illustrated with a case study consisting of a typical residential neighborhood in Miami, FL.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, NAT CAT MAN MAD DIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, HAZ MH 2 1 TECHN MAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, 716 ASCESEI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, NOAA State of the Coast Report Series
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, REPORTER CENSUS
  • [6] On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (04) : 515 - 522
  • [7] Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions
    Bhamra, Ran
    Dani, Samir
    Burnard, Kevin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) : 5375 - 5393
  • [8] A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities
    Bruneau, M
    Chang, SE
    Eguchi, RT
    Lee, GC
    O'Rourke, TD
    Reinhorn, AM
    Shinozuka, M
    Tierney, K
    Wallace, WA
    von Winterfeldt, D
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) : 733 - 752
  • [9] Burton H.V., 2016, Journal of Structural Engineering, V142
  • [10] A framework and case study for integrating household decision-making into post-earthquake recovery models
    Burton, Henry
    Kang, Hua
    Miles, Scott
    Nejat, Ali
    Yi, Zhengxiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 37