Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents

被引:153
作者
Kissling, W. D. [1 ]
Dormann, Carsten F. [2 ,3 ]
Groeneveld, Juergen [4 ,5 ]
Hickler, Thomas [6 ]
Kuehn, Ingolf [7 ]
McInerny, Greg J. [8 ]
Montoya, Jose M. [9 ]
Roemermann, Christine [10 ,11 ]
Schiffers, Katja [12 ]
Schurr, Frank M. [10 ,13 ]
Singer, Alexander [4 ]
Svenning, Jens-Christian [1 ]
Zimmermann, Niklaus E. [14 ]
O'Hara, Robert B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Ecoinformat & Biodivers Grp, Dept Biosci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Univ Freiburg, Fac Forest & Environm Sci, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecol Modelling, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Auckland, Sch Environm, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[6] Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr BiK F, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[7] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Community Ecol, D-06120 Halle, Germany
[8] Microsoft Res, Sci Computat Lab, Computat Ecol & Environm Sci Grp, Cambridge CB3 0FB, England
[9] CSIC, Inst Ciencias Mar, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain
[10] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Phys Geog, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
[11] Univ Regensburg, Fac Biol & Preclin Med, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
[12] Univ J Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553, Lab Ecol Alpine, F-38041 Grenoble 9, France
[13] Univ Potsdam, Inst Biochem & Biol, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[14] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
关键词
Community ecology; ecological networks; global change; guild assembly; multidimensional complexity; niche theory; prediction; species distribution model; species interactions; trait-based community modules; ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; FUTURE DISTRIBUTION; IMPROVE PREDICTION; GLOBAL CHANGE; FOOD WEBS; IMPACTS; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02663.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim Biotic interactions within guilds or across trophic levels have widely been ignored in species distribution models (SDMs). This synthesis outlines the development of species interaction distribution models (SIDMs), which aim to incorporate multispecies interactions at large spatial extents using interaction matrices. Location Local to global. Methods We review recent approaches for extending classical SDMs to incorporate biotic interactions, and identify some methodological and conceptual limitations. To illustrate possible directions for conceptual advancement we explore three principal ways of modelling multispecies interactions using interaction matrices: simple qualitative linkages between species, quantitative interaction coefficients reflecting interaction strengths, and interactions mediated by interaction currencies. We explain methodological advancements for static interaction data and multispecies time series, and outline methods to reduce complexity when modelling multispecies interactions. Results Classical SDMs ignore biotic interactions and recent SDM extensions only include the unidirectional influence of one or a few species. However, novel methods using error matrices in multivariate regression models allow interactions between multiple species to be modelled explicitly with spatial co-occurrence data. If time series are available, multivariate versions of population dynamic models can be applied that account for the effects and relative importance of species interactions and environmental drivers. These methods need to be extended by incorporating the non-stationarity in interaction coefficients across space and time, and are challenged by the limited empirical knowledge on spatio-temporal variation in the existence and strength of species interactions. Model complexity may be reduced by: (1) using prior ecological knowledge to set a subset of interaction coefficients to zero, (2) modelling guilds and functional groups rather than individual species, and (3) modelling interaction currencies and species effect and response traits. Main conclusions There is great potential for developing novel approaches that incorporate multispecies interactions into the projection of species distributions and community structure at large spatial extents. Progress can be made by: (1) developing statistical models with interaction matrices for multispecies co-occurrence datasets across large-scale environmental gradients, (2) testing the potential and limitations of methods for complexity reduction, and (3) sampling and monitoring comprehensive spatio-temporal data on biotic interactions in multispecies communities.
引用
收藏
页码:2163 / 2178
页数:16
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs [J].
Amarasekare, Priyanga .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2008, 39 :479-500
[2]   The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Luoto, Miska .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (06) :743-753
[3]   Stationary process approximation for the analysis of large spatial datasets [J].
Banerjee, Sudipto ;
Gelfand, Alan E. ;
Finley, Andrew O. ;
Sang, Huiyan .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2008, 70 :825-848
[4]   Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Olesen, JM .
SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5772) :431-433
[5]   Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity [J].
Bascompte, Jordi ;
Jordano, Pedro .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2007, 38 :567-593
[6]   Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities [J].
Berlow, EL ;
Neutel, AM ;
Cohen, JE ;
de Ruiter, PC ;
Ebenman, B ;
Emmerson, M ;
Fox, JW ;
Jansen, VAA ;
Jones, JI ;
Kokkoris, GD ;
Logofet, DO ;
McKane, AJ ;
Montoya, JM ;
Petchey, O .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (03) :585-598
[7]   How functional is functional? Ecological groupings in terrestrial animal ecology: towards an animal functional type approach [J].
Blaum, Niels ;
Mosner, Eva ;
Schwager, Monika ;
Jeltsch, Florian .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2011, 20 (11) :2333-2345
[8]  
Brown JH, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1771, DOI 10.1890/03-9000
[9]   A review of forest gap models [J].
Bugmann, H .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2001, 51 (3-4) :259-305
[10]  
Burnham KP., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636