Electronic Patient Registries Improve Diabetes Care and Clinical Outcomes in Rural Community Health Centers

被引:33
作者
Pollard, Cecil [1 ]
Bailey, Kelly A. [1 ]
Petitte, Trisha [1 ]
Baus, Adam [1 ]
Swim, Mary [1 ]
Hendryx, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Community Med, Off Hlth Serv Res, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00202.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Diabetes care is challenging in rural areas. Research has shown that the utilization of electronic patient registries improves care; however, improvements generally have been described in combination with other ongoing interventions. The level of basic registry utilization sufficient for positive change is unknown. Purpose: The goal of the current study was to examine differential effects of basic registry utilization on diabetes care processes and clinical outcomes according to level of registry use in a rural setting. Methods: Patients with diabetes (N = 661) from 6 Federally Qualified Health Centers in rural West Virginia were entered into an electronic patient registry. Data from pre- and post-registry were compared among 3 treatment and control groups that had different levels of registry utilization: low, medium, or high (for example, variations in the use of registry-generated progress notes examined at the point-of-care and in the accuracy of registry-generated summary reports to track patients' care). Data included care processes (annual exams, screens to promote wellness, education, and self-management goal-setting) and clinical outcomes (HbA1c, LDL, HDL, cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure). Findings: The registry assisted in significantly improving 12 of 13 care processes and 3 of 6 clinical outcomes (HbA1c, LDL, cholesterol) for patients exposed to at least medium levels of registry utilization, but not for the controls. For example, the percent of patients who had received an annual eye exam at follow-up was 11%, 34%, and 38% for the low, medium, and high utilization groups, respectively; only the latter groups improved. Conclusions: As an initial step to achieving control of diabetes, basic registry utilization may be sufficient to drive improvements in provider-patient care processes and in patient outcomes in rural clinics with few resources.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, 2006, NAT HEALTHC QUAL REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[3]   Socio-economic inequalities in diabetes complications, control, attitudes and health service use: a cross-sectional study [J].
Bachmann, MO ;
Eachus, J ;
Hopper, CD ;
Smith, GD ;
Propper, C ;
Pearson, NJ ;
Williams, S ;
Tallon, D ;
Frankel, S .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (11) :921-929
[4]   Feasibility and effectiveness of system redesign for diabetes care management in rural areas - The eastern North Carolina experience [J].
Bray, P ;
Roupe, M ;
Young, S ;
Harrell, J ;
Cummings, DM ;
Whetstone, LM .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2005, 31 (05) :712-718
[5]   Confronting disparities in diabetes care: The clinical effectiveness of redesigning care management for minority patients in rural primary care practices [J].
Bray, P ;
Thompson, D ;
Wynn, JD ;
Cummings, DM ;
Whetstone, L .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2005, 21 (04) :317-321
[6]   Improvements in care and reduced self-management barriers among rural patients with diabetes [J].
Dettori, N ;
Flook, BN ;
Pessl, E ;
Quesenberry, K ;
Loh, J ;
Harris, C ;
McDowall, JM ;
Butcher, MK ;
Helgerson, SD ;
Gohdes, D ;
Harwell, TS .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2005, 21 (02) :172-177
[7]   Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on patient care in a community clinic [J].
East, J ;
Krishnamurthy, P ;
Freed, B ;
Nosovitski, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2003, 18 (04) :150-154
[8]   Vulnerable populations with diabetes mellitus [J].
Garcia, Alexandra A. ;
Benavides-Vaello, Sandra .
NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 41 (04) :605-+
[9]  
Haase R, 2006, JT COMM J QUAL PATIE, V32, P246, DOI 10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32032-6
[10]  
Hummel J., 2003, Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, V10, P541