A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities

被引:113
作者
Bedoya-Perez, Miguel A. [1 ]
Carthey, Alexandra J. R. [1 ]
Mella, Valentina S. A. [1 ]
McArthur, Clare [1 ]
Banks, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Foraging; Giving-up density; Landscape of fear; Methodological limitations; Practical assumptions; Supplementary approaches; PATCH-USE BEHAVIOR; PREDATION RISK; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT SELECTION; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES; MICROHABITAT USE; TIME ALLOCATION; SEED PREDATION; FEEDING EFFORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-013-1609-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The giving-up density (GUD) framework provides a powerful experimental approach with a strong theoretical underpinning to quantify foraging outcomes in heterogeneous landscapes. Since its inception, the GUD approach has been applied successfully to a vast range of foraging species and foraging scenarios. However, its application is not simple, as anyone who has tried to use it for the first time might attest. Limitations of the technique were noted at its conception, yet only the artificiality of the patches, the appropriateness of the food resource, and the possibility of multiple visiting foragers were identified. Here we show the current uses of GUD and outline the practical benefits as well as the often overlooked limitations of the technique. We define seven major points that need to be addressed when applying this methodology: (1) the curvilinearity between harvest rate and energy, (2) the energetic state of the forager, (3) the effect of group foraging, (4) food quality and substrate properties, (5) the predictability of the patch, (6) behavioral traits of the forager, and (7) nontarget species. We also suggest how GUD experiments can be enhanced by incorporating complementary methods (such as cameras) to better understand the foraging processes involved in the GUD itself. We conclude that the benefits of using GUD outweigh the costs, but that its limitations should not be ignored. Incorporating new methods when using GUD can potentially offer novel and important insights into the study of foraging behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1541 / 1553
页数:13
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]   Does interspecific competition from congeners cause the scarcity of Gerbillus henleyi in productive sandy desert habitats? [J].
Abramsky, Z ;
Rosenzweig, ML ;
Elbaz, M ;
Ziv, Y .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 74 (03) :567-578
[2]   The cost of interspecific competition in two gerbil species [J].
Abramsky, Z ;
Rosenzweig, ML ;
Subach, A .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 70 (04) :561-567
[3]   Patch use behaviour of Elephantulus myurus and Micaelamys namaquensis: the role of diet, foraging substrates and escape substrates [J].
Abu Baker, Mohammad A. ;
Brown, Joel S. .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2012, 50 (02) :167-175
[4]   Islands of fear: effects of wooded patches on habitat suitability of the striped mouse in a South African grassland [J].
Abu Baker, Mohammad A. ;
Brown, Joel S. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) :1313-1322
[5]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[6]   Microhabitat-scale influences of resources and refuge on habitat selection by an estuarine opportunist fish [J].
Alofs, KM ;
Polivka, KM .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 271 :297-306
[7]  
Altendorf KB, 2001, J MAMMAL, V82, P430, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0430:AEOPRO>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Foraging patch selection and departure by non-omniscient foragers: A field example in white-fronted geese [J].
Amano, Tatsuya ;
Ushiyama, Katsumi ;
Fujita, Go ;
Higuchi, Hiroyoshi .
ETHOLOGY, 2006, 112 (06) :544-553
[10]   Habitat-mediated variation in predation risk by the American marten [J].
Andruskiw, Mark ;
Fryxell, John M. ;
Thompson, Ian D. ;
Baker, James A. .
ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (08) :2273-2280