Complex relationships between species niches and environmental heterogeneity affect species co-occurrence patterns in modelled and real communities

被引:52
作者
Bar-Massada, Avi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Biol & Environm, IL-36006 Qiryat Tivon, Israel
关键词
co-occurrence; niche overlap; niche breadth; environmental heterogeneity; null models; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NULL MODELS; CHECKERBOARD; FACILITATION; RICHNESS;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2015.0927
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Species co-occurrence analysis is commonly used to assess how interspecific interactions dictate community assembly. Non-random co-occurrences, however, may also emerge from niche differences as well as environmental heterogeneity. The relationships between species co-occurrence patterns, environmental heterogeneity and species niches are not fully understood, due to complex interactions among them. To analyse the relationships among these patterns and processes, I developed synthetic community models and analysed a large dataset of tree species across the conterminous United States. Niche overlap and environmental heterogeneity had significant and contrasting effects on species co-occurrence patterns, in both modelled and real communities. Niche breadth, in turn, affected the effect sizes of both variables on species co-occurrence patterns. The effect of niche breadth on the relationship between co-occurrence and niche overlap was markedly consistent between modelled and real communities, while its effect on the relationship between co-occurrence and environmental heterogeneity was mostly consistent between real and modelled data. The results of this analysis highlight the complex and interactive effects of species niche overlap, niche breadth and environmental heterogeneity on species co-occurrence patterns. Therefore, inferring ecological processes from co-occurrence patterns without accounting for these fundamental characteristics of species and environments may lead to biased conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]   Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas [J].
Hijmans, RJ ;
Cameron, SE ;
Parra, JL ;
Jones, PG ;
Jarvis, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (15) :1965-1978
[32]  
Hubbell Stephen P., 2001, V32, pi
[33]   Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: A global study [J].
Kikvidze, Z ;
Pugnaire, FI ;
Brooker, RW ;
Choler, P ;
Lortie, CJ ;
Michalet, R ;
Callaway, RM .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (06) :1395-1400
[34]   The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology [J].
Leibold, MA ;
Holyoak, M ;
Mouquet, N ;
Amarasekare, P ;
Chase, JM ;
Hoopes, MF ;
Holt, RD ;
Shurin, JB ;
Law, R ;
Tilman, D ;
Loreau, M ;
Gonzalez, A .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (07) :601-613
[35]   Patterns of co-occurrence of stream insects and an examination of a causal mechanism: ecological checkerboard or habitat checkerboard? [J].
McCreadie, John W. ;
Bedwell, Christopher R. .
INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2013, 6 (02) :105-113
[36]   Randomization of presence-absence matrices: Comments and new algorithms [J].
Miklos, I ;
Podani, J .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (01) :86-92
[37]  
Oksanen J., 2013, Vegan: community ecology package, DOI DOI 10.HTTP://CRAN.R-PR0JECT.0RG
[38]   Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions [J].
Ovaskainen, Otso ;
Hottola, Jenni ;
Siitonen, Juha .
ECOLOGY, 2010, 91 (09) :2514-2521
[39]   Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework [J].
Pandit, Shubha N. ;
Kolasa, Jurek ;
Cottenie, Karl .
ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (08) :2253-2262
[40]   Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? [J].
Pearson, RG ;
Dawson, TP .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (05) :361-371