Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies for achieving the 1.5 °C target - insights from a comparison of German bottom-up energy scenarios

被引:11
作者
Samadi, Sascha [1 ]
Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia [1 ]
Lechtenboehmer, Stefan [1 ]
Knoop, Katharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuppertal Inst Climate Environm & Energy, Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
comparative analysis; decarbonization; energy scenarios; climate change mitigation; Paris Agreement; RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY; IMPACTS; SCIENCE; SYSTEM; TRANSFORMATION; GENERATION; SOLAR;
D O I
10.1080/17583004.2018.1475174
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paris Agreement calls on all nations to pursue efforts to contribute to limiting the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. However, due to limited global, regional and country-specific analysis of highly ambitious GHG mitigation pathways, there is currently a lack of knowledge about the transformational changes needed in the coming decades to reach this target. Through a meta-analysis of mitigation scenarios for Germany, this article aims to contribute to an improved understanding of the changes needed in the energy system of an industrialized country. Differentiation among six key long-term energy system decarbonization strategies is suggested, and an analysis is presented of how these strategies will be pursued until 2050 in selected technologically detailed energy scenarios for Germany. The findings show, that certain strategies, including the widespread use of electricity-derived synthetic fuels in end-use sectors as well as behavioral changes, are typically applied to a greater extent in mitigation scenarios aiming at high GHG emission reductions compared to more moderate mitigation scenarios. The analysis also highlights that the pace of historical changes observed in Germany between 2000 and 2015 is clearly insufficient to adequately contribute to not only the 1.5 degrees C target, but also the 2 degrees C long-term global target.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 562
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
AG Energiebilanzen, 2017, DAT FAKT
[2]  
[Anonymous], GERM 2050 GREENH GAS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PATHWAYS DEEP DECARB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ENERGIEWENDE IHRE MO
[5]  
BMUB, 2015, KLIM 2050 2
[6]  
BMWi, 2014, ENTW EN EN PROGN STU
[7]  
Borghesi S, 2008, GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY - SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230583412
[8]   An analysis of the decline of electricity spot prices in Europe: Who is to blame? [J].
Bublitz, Andreas ;
Keles, Dogan ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :323-336
[9]   An assessment of the regional potential for solar power generation in EU-28 [J].
Castillo, Carolina Perpina ;
Batista e Silva, Filipe ;
Lavalle, Carlo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 88 :86-99
[10]  
Chertow M.R., 2000, J Ind Ecol, V4, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1162/10881980052541927, 10.1162/10881980052541927]