Load-settlement characteristics of large-scale square footing on sand reinforced with opening geocell reinforcement

被引:57
作者
Shadmand, A. [1 ]
Ghazavi, M. [2 ]
Ganjian, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Geosynthetics; Geocell with an opening; Large scale model test; Reinforced sand; Square footing; Surface deformation; Improvement factor; BEARING-CAPACITY; SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS; SOFT CLAY; BEHAVIOR; BEDS; SOIL; GEOSYNTHETICS; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper describes load-carrying characteristics of a series of large-scale steel square footing tests performed on sand reinforced with two types of reinforcement methods. These are full geocell reinforcement (FGR) and geocell with an opening reinforcement (GOR). A thick steel square plate with 500 mm by 500 mm dimensions and 30 mm thickness was used as foundation. The parameters varying in the tests include the depth of geocell mattress (u), width of opening in geocell in the GOR type (w), relative density of sand (D-r) and number of geocell layers (N). The results revealed that the use of GOR and FGR methods enhances significantly the footing load carrying capacity, decreases the footing settlement and decreases the surface heave. It has been found that the use of GOR with an opening width of w/B < 0.92, has the same improvement effect on the footing load-carrying response as the FOR has (B = footing width). Furthermore, with increasing the number of geocell layers from 1 to 2 in both GOR and FGR methods, the footing bearing pressure increases and footing settlement, surface heave and difference of performance between FOR and GOR mattress decrease.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 326
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations [J].
Adams, MT ;
Collin, JG .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (01) :66-72
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, D1196M ASTM
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 4 INT C GEOT GEOM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J MAT CIVIL ENG ASCE
[5]   Effect of footing shape and load eccentricity on behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand bed [J].
Badakhshan, Ehsan ;
Noorzad, Ali .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2017, 45 (02) :58-67
[6]   Modelling of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading [J].
Biabani, M. Mandi ;
Indraratna, Buddhima ;
Ngoc Trung Ngo .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2016, 44 (04) :489-503
[7]  
Binquet J., 1975, J GEOTECHNICAL ENGG, V23, P1241, DOI [10.1061/AJGEB6.0000219, DOI 10.1061/AJGEB6.0000219]
[8]   Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems [J].
Biswas, A. ;
Krishna, A. Murali ;
Dash, S. K. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 20 (06) :376-388
[9]   Modeling of the cyclic behavior of shallow foundations resting on geomesh and grid-anchor reinforced sand [J].
Boushehrian, A. H. ;
Hataf, N. ;
Ghahramani, A. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2011, 29 (03) :242-248
[10]   On physically similar systems, illustrations of the use of dimensional equations [J].
Buckingham, E .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1914, 4 (04) :345-376