Protocol-based image-guided salvage brachytherapy Early results in patients with local failure of prostate cancer after radiation therapy

被引:0
作者
Lahmer, G. [1 ]
Lotter, M. [1 ]
Kreppner, S. [1 ]
Fietkau, R. [1 ]
Strnad, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Salvage brachytherapy; Side effects; Tumor response; Recurrent prostate cancer; Re-irradiation; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANTATION; SURGERY; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-013-0373-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To assess the overall clinical outcome of protocol-based image-guided salvage pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure particularly regarding feasibility and side effects. Eighteen consecutive patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer (median age, 69 years) were treated during 2005-2011 with interstitial PDR brachytherapy (PDR-BT) as salvage brachytherapy after radiotherapy failure. The treatment schedule was PDR-BT two times with 30 Gy (pulse dose 0.6 Gy/h, 24 h per day) corresponding to a total dose of 60 Gy. Dose volume adaptation was performed with the aim of optimal coverage of the whole prostate (V-100 > 95 %) simultaneously respecting the protocol-based dose volume constraints for the urethra (D-0.1 cc < 130 %) and the rectum (D-2 cc < 50-60 %) taking into account the previous radiation therapy. Local relapse after radiotherapy (external beam irradiation, brachytherapy with J-125 seeds or combination) was confirmed mostly via choline-PET and increased PSA levels. The primary endpoint was treatment-related late toxicities-particularly proctitis, anal incontinence, cystitis, urinary incontinence, urinary frequency/urgency, and urinary retention according to the Common Toxicity Criteria. The secondary endpoint was PSA-recurrence-free survival. We registered urinary toxicities only. Grade 2 and grade 3 toxicities were observed in up to 11.1 % (2/18) and 16.7 % (3/18) of patients, respectively. The most frequent late-event grade 3 toxicity was urinary retention in 17 % (3/18) of patients. No late gastrointestinal side effects occurred. The biochemical PSA-recurrence-free survival probability at 3 years was 57.1 %. The overall survival at 3 years was 88.9 %; 22 % (4/18) of patients developed metastases. The median follow-up time for all patients after salvage BT was 21 months (range, 8-77 months). Salvage PDR-brachytherapy of the prostate following local failure after radiation therapy is a treatment option with a low rate of genitourinary side effects and no late gastrointestinal side effects. The treatment efficacy in the first 3 years is promising.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 674
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Results
    Bolzicco, Giampaolo
    Favretto, Maria Silvia
    Scremin, Enrico
    Tambone, Carmelo
    Tasca, Andrea
    Guglielmi, Rosabianca
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [22] Management of prostate cancer recurrences after radiation therapy-brachytherapy as a salvage option
    Allen, Gregory W.
    Howard, Andrew R.
    Jarrard, David F.
    Ritter, Mark A.
    CANCER, 2007, 110 (07) : 1405 - 1416
  • [23] Patterns of outcome and toxicity after salvage prostatectomy, salvage cryosurgery and salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer recurrences after radiation therapy: a multi-center experience and literature review
    Peters, Max
    Moman, Maaike R.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Vergunst, Henk
    de Jong, Igle Jan
    Vijverberg, Peter L. M.
    Battermann, Jan J.
    Horenblas, Simon
    van Vulpen, Marco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) : 403 - 409
  • [24] Salvage brachytherapy in prostate local recurrence after radiation therapy: predicting factors for control and toxicity
    Iván Henríquez
    Gemma Sancho
    Asunción Hervás
    Benjamin Guix
    Joan Pera
    Cristina Gutierrez
    Oscar Abuchaibe
    Rafael Martínez-Monge
    Alejandro Tormo
    Alfredo Polo
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [25] Preliminary analysis of early and late radiation responses in 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Andreyeva, Olga B.
    Adylkhanov, Tasbolat A.
    Kaidarova, Dilyara R.
    Isayev, Isa G.
    Kurmangaliyev, Tolegen S.
    Khismetova, Zaituna A.
    Glushkova, Natalya E.
    RUSSIAN OPEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [26] EARLY OUTCOMES FROM THREE PROSPECTIVE TRIALS OF IMAGE-GUIDED PROTON THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    Li, Zuofeng
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Marcus, Robert B., Jr.
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Nichols, R. Charles
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Williams, Christopher R.
    Costa, Joseph
    Henderson, Randal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (01): : 213 - 221
  • [27] Changes in sexual function and serum testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer after image-guided proton therapy
    Hattori, Yukiko
    Iwata, Hiromitsu
    Nakajima, Koichiro
    Nomura, Kento
    Hayashi, Kensuke
    Toshito, Toshiyuki
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Umemoto, Yukihiro
    Mizoe, Jun-etsu
    Ogino, Hiroyuki
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (03) : 517 - 524
  • [28] REDUCTION OF DOSE DELIVERED TO ORGANS AT RISK IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS VIA IMAGE-GUIDED RADIATION THERAPY
    Pawlowski, Jason M.
    Yang, Eddy S.
    Malcolm, Arnold W.
    Coffey, Charles W.
    Ding, George X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : 924 - 934
  • [29] LONG-TERM OUTCOME AND TOXICITY OF SALVAGE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LOCAL FAILURE AFTER INITIAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Burri, Ryan J.
    Stone, Nelson N.
    Unger, Pam
    Stock, Richard G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (05): : 1338 - 1344
  • [30] Outcomes after salvage radical prostatectomy and first-line radiation therapy or HIFU for recurrent localized prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study
    Clery, Romain
    Grande, Pietro
    Seisen, Thomas
    Gobert, Aurelien
    Duquesne, Igor
    Villers, Arnauld
    Olivier, Jonathan
    Bernhard, Jean-Christophe
    Robert, Gregoire
    Beauval, Jean Baptiste
    Prudhomme, Thomas
    Bruyere, Franck
    Laine-Caroff, Paul
    Waltregny, David
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Panarello, Daniele
    Ruffion, Alain
    De Bayser, Hubert
    de La Taille, Alexandre
    Roupret, Morgan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (08) : 1491 - 1498