Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:43
作者
Schol, Pim B. B. [1 ]
Terink, Ivon M. [2 ]
Lance, Marcus D. [3 ]
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, PO 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, PO 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Treatment, PO 5800, Maastricht 6202, AZ, Netherlands
关键词
Elective surgical procedures; Fluid therapy; Review; systematic; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; COAGULATION; RECOVERY; THERAPY; RISK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; HEMODILUTION; HYPOTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This article reviews if a restrictive fluid management policy reduces the complication rate if compared to liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The PubMed database was explored by 2 independent researchers. We used the following search terms: "Blood transfusion (MESH); transfusion need; fluid therapy (MESH); permissive hypotension; fluid management; resuscitation; restrictive fluid management; liberal fluid management; elective surgery; damage control resuscitation; surgical procedures, operative (MESH); wounds (MESH); injuries (MESH); surgery; trauma patients." A secondary search in the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library revealed no additional results. We selected randomized controlled trials performed during elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive fluid management policy or to a liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The patient characteristics and the type of surgery varied. All but 3 studies reported American Society of Anaesthesiologists groups 1 to 3 as the inclusion criterion. The primary outcome of interest is total number of patients with a complication and the complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are infection rate, transfusion need, postoperative rebleeding, hospital stay, and renal function. In total, 1397 patients were analyzed (693 restrictive protocol, 704 liberal protocol). Meta-analysis showed that in the restrictive group as compared with the liberal group, fewer patients experienced a complication (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.78). The total complication rate (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64), risk of infection (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79), and transfusion rate (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99) were also lower. The postoperative rebleeding did not differ in both groups: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.28-2.06). We conclude that compared with a liberal fluid policy, a restrictive fluid policy in elective surgery results in a 35% reduction in patient with a complication and should be advised as the preferred fluid management policy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Randomized clinical trial of fluid restriction in colorectal surgery [J].
Abraham-Nordling, M. ;
Hjern, F. ;
Pollack, J. ;
Prytz, M. ;
Borg, T. ;
Kressner, U. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (02) :186-191
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J SURG ONCOL, DOI DOI 10.1002/jso.23857
[3]  
Bamboat Zubin M, 2009, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, V22, P28, DOI 10.1055/s-0029-1202883
[4]   Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of postoperative morbidity, poor graft function, and early rejection in 190 patients undergoing liver transplantation [J].
Bennett-Guerrero, E ;
Feierman, DE ;
Barclay, GR ;
Parides, MK ;
Sheiner, PA ;
Mythen, MG ;
Levine, DM ;
Parker, TS ;
Carroll, SF ;
White, ML ;
Winfree, WJ .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (10) :1177-1183
[5]   Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Major Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Clinical Trials [J].
Boland, Michael R. ;
Noorani, Ayesha ;
Varty, Kevin ;
Coffey, J. Calvin ;
Agha, Riaz ;
Walsh, Stewart R. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) :1193-1202
[6]   Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: Comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens - A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial [J].
Brandstrup, B ;
Tonnesen, H ;
Beier-Holgersen, R ;
Hjortso, E ;
Ording, H ;
Lindorff-Larsen, K ;
Rasmussen, MS ;
Lanng, C ;
Wallin, L ;
Iversen, LH ;
Gramkow, CS ;
Okholm, M ;
Blemmer, T ;
Svendsen, PE ;
Rottensten, HH ;
Thage, B ;
Riis, J ;
Jeppesen, IS ;
Teilum, D ;
Christensen, AM ;
Graungaard, B ;
Pott, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (05) :641-648
[7]   Fluid therapy for the surgical patient [J].
Brandstrup, Birgitte .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) :265-283
[8]   'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' perioperative fluid therapy - a critical assessment of the evidence [J].
Bundgaard-Nielsen, M. ;
Secher, N. H. ;
Kehlet, H. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 53 (07) :843-851
[9]   Impact of experimental haemodilution on platelet function, thrombin generation and clot firmness: effects of different coagulation factor concentrates [J].
Caballo, Carolina ;
Escolar, Gines ;
Diaz-Ricart, Maribel ;
Lopez-Vilchez, Irene ;
Lozano, Miguel ;
Cid, Joan ;
Pino, Marcos ;
Beltran, Joan ;
Basora, Misericordia ;
Pereira, Arturo ;
Galan, Ana M. .
BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2013, 11 (03) :391-399
[10]   Fluids and gastrointestinal function [J].
Chowdhury, Abeed H. ;
Lobo, Dileep N. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2011, 14 (05) :469-476