Performance in physiology evaluation: possible improvement by active learning strategies

被引:28
作者
Montrezor, Luis H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Araraquara, UNIARA, Dept Biol Sci & Hlth Med, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] QUIMMERA UNIARA, Med Chem & Regenerat Med Grp, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[3] Brazilian Soc Physiol, Undergrad Educ Comm, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
evaluation; graduate education; active methodologies; physiology; ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00022.2016
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The evaluation process is complex and extremely important in the teaching/learning process. Evaluations are constantly employed in the classroom to assist students in the learning process and to help teachers improve the teaching process. The use of active methodologies encourages students to participate in the learning process, encourages interaction with their peers, and stimulates thinking about physiological mechanisms. This study examined the performance of medical students on physiology over four semesters with and without active engagement methodologies. Four activities were used: a puzzle, a board game, a debate, and a video. The results show that engaging in activities with active methodologies before a physiology cognitive monitoring test significantly improved student performance compared with not performing the activities. We integrate the use of these methodologies with classic lectures, and this integration appears to improve the teaching/learning process in the discipline of physiology and improves the integration of physiology with cardiology and neurology. In addition, students enjoy the activities and perform better on their evaluations when they use them.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 457
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Are they paying attention? Students' lack of motivation and attention potentially threaten the utility of course evaluations [J].
Bassett, Jonathan ;
Cleveland, Amanda ;
Acorn, Deborah ;
Nix, Marie ;
Snyder, Timothy .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (03) :431-442
[2]   Tracking undergraduate student achievement in a first-year physiology course using a cluster analysis approach [J].
Brown, S. J. ;
White, S. ;
Power, N. .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2015, 39 (04) :278-282
[3]   Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students [J].
Chisnall, Ben ;
Vince, Tushar ;
Hall, Sarah K. ;
Tribe, Rachel M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 6 :76-83
[4]  
Faust J.L., 1998, J EXCELLENCE COLL TE, V9, P3
[5]   Case-based learning in endocrine physiology: an approach toward self-directed learning and the development of soft skills in medical students [J].
Gade, Shubhada ;
Chari, Suresh .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2013, 37 (04) :356-360
[6]   Using paper presentation breaks during didactic lectures improves learning of physiology in undergraduate students [J].
Ghorbani, Ahmad ;
Ghazvini, Kiarash .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, 40 (01) :93-97
[7]   Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education? [J].
Gurpinar, Erol ;
Alimoglu, Mustafa Kemal ;
Mamakli, Sumer ;
Aktekin, Mehmet .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2010, 34 (04) :192-196
[8]   Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills [J].
Klegeris, Andis ;
Hurren, Heather .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 35 (04) :408-415
[9]   Active Learning in Medical Education: Application to the Training of Surgeons [J].
Luc, Jessica G. Y. ;
Antonoff, Mara B. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 3 :51-56
[10]   Variation in assessment and standard setting practices across UK undergraduate medicine and the need for a benchmark [J].
MacDougall, Margaret .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 6 :125-135