Evaluation of the effectiveness of primary health care in South and Northeast Brazil:: methodological contributions

被引:39
作者
Facchini, Luiz Augusto [1 ]
Piccini, Roberto Xavier
Tomasi, Elaine [2 ,3 ]
Thume, Elaine [4 ]
Teixeira, Vanessa Andina [5 ]
da Silveira, Denise Silva [3 ]
Maia, Maria de Fatima Santos
Siqueira, Fernando Vinholes [2 ]
Rodrigues, Maria Aparecida [6 ]
Paniz, Vera Vieira
Osorio, Alessander
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Programa Posgrad Epidemiol, Dept Social Med, BR-96030002 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Catolica Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
[3] Secretaria Municipal Saude & Bem Estar Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas, Fac Enfermagem & Obstet, BR-96030002 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[5] Fundacao Univ Fed Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
[6] Secretaria Estadual Saude Rio Grande Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2008年 / 24卷
关键词
primary health care; health evaluation; effectiveness; health services epidemiology;
D O I
10.1590/S0102-311X2008001300020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The article presents the methodology used in the Baseline Study that evaluated the effectiveness of the Family Health Strategy as compared to traditional primary health care units. The study included 41 municipalities with more than 100 thousand inhabitants each, 21 from the South and 20 from the Northeast of Brazil. As the principal dependent variable and underlying premise for sampling in the Baseline Study, the effectiveness of program activities in the primary care units was analyzed in the population within the respective coverage areas, using an epidemiological survey. The health care model in the primary care units was the principal independent variable. Its effect on program activities was controlled according to geopolitical region, metropolitan area, and population size in the municipalities. Coverage of the activities was characterized according to socioeconomic, demographic, and health-related factors. The use of comparison groups, multiple-stage samples, standardized measures, adjustment for geographic and socio-demographic characteristics, and well-defined criteria for judging the findings are contributions by the methodology employed here for designing future studies to evaluate primary health care.
引用
收藏
页码:S159 / S172
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Avaliacao em saude
[2]  
AQUILINO WS, 1992, INT J ADDICT, V27, P71
[3]   VALIDITY OF CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK-FACTORS ASSESSED BY TELEPHONE SURVEY - THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEY [J].
BOWLIN, SJ ;
MORRILL, BD ;
NAFZIGER, AN ;
JENKINS, PL ;
LEWIS, C ;
PEARSON, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (06) :561-571
[4]  
Contandriopoulos AP, 2000, REV EPIDEMIOL SANTE, V48, P517
[5]   Assessing federally-supported academic research in the United States [J].
Cozzens, SE .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2000, 9 (01) :5-10
[6]   Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement [J].
Des Jarlais, DC ;
Lyles, C ;
Crepaz, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (03) :361-366
[7]  
Felisberto Eronildo, 2006, Ciênc. saúde coletiva, V11, P553, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232006000300002
[8]   Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact [J].
Habicht, JP ;
Victora, CG ;
Vaughan, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (01) :10-18
[9]  
HARTZ Z. M. A, 1999, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V4, P341
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174