An Objective Measure of Noseband Tightness and Its Measurement Using a Novel Digital Tightness Gauge

被引:14
作者
Dohertry, Orla [1 ]
Conway, Thomas [2 ]
Conway, Richard [2 ]
Murray, Gerard [3 ]
Casey, Vincent [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Dept Life Sci, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Univ Limerick, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Aaron Value Adding Serv Ltd, Unit M7,Smithstown Ind Estate, Shannon, Co Clare, Ireland
[4] Univ Limerick, Dept Phys, Limerick, Ireland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
PRESSURE; THRESHOLDS; HORSES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0168996
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Noseband tightness is difficult to assess in horses participating in equestrian sports such as dressage, show jumping and three-day-eventing. There is growing concern that nosebands are commonly tightened to such an extent as to restrict normal equine behaviour and possibly cause injury. In the absence of a clear agreed definition of noseband tightness, a simple model of the equine nose-noseband interface environment was developed in order to guide further studies in this area. The normal force component of the noseband tensile force was identified as the key contributor to sub-noseband tissue compression. The model was used to inform the design of a digital tightness gauge which could reliably measure the normal force component of the noseband tensile force. A digital tightness gauge was developed to measure this parameter under nosebands fitted to bridled horses. Results are presented for field tests using two prototype designs. Prototype version three was used in field trial 1 (n = 15, frontal nasal plane sub-noseband site). Results of this trial were used to develop an ergonomically designed prototype, version 4, which was tested in a second field trial (n = 12, frontal nasal plane and lateral sub-noseband site). Nosebands were set to three tightness settings in each trial as judged by a single rater using an International Society for Equitation Science (ISES) taper gauge. Normal forces in the range 7-95 N were recorded at the frontal nasal plane while a lower range 1-28 N was found at the lateral site for the taper gauge range used in the trials. The digital tightness gauge was found to be simple to use, reliable, and safe and its use did not agitate the animals in any discernable way. A simple six point tightness scale is suggested to aid regulation implementation and the control of noseband tightness using normal force measurement as the objective tightness discriminant.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Adams RA, 2003, CALCULUS COMPLETE CO
[2]  
Casey V, 2016, A tightness gauge for estimating the tightness of a restrictive strap, Patent No. [2016/0142, 20160142]
[3]   A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse [J].
Casey, Vincent ;
McGreevy, Paul D. ;
O'Muiris, Eoghan ;
Doherty, Orla .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2013, 8 (06) :479-484
[4]  
Casey V, 2011, APPLIED BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, P243
[5]  
Doherty O., 2016, P 12 INT C INT SOC E, P53
[6]   Stride-related rein tension patterns in walk and trot in the ridden horse [J].
Egenvall, Agneta ;
Roepstorff, Lars ;
Eisersio, Marie ;
Rhodin, Marie ;
van Weeren, Rene .
ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 57
[7]   Pilot study of behavior responses in young riding horses using 2 methods of making transitions from trot to walk [J].
Egenvall, Agneta ;
Eisersio, Marie ;
Roepstorff, Lars .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2012, 7 (03) :157-168
[8]  
Eisersio M, 2013, THESIS
[9]   Tourniquet pain in a volunteer study: effect of changes in cuff width and pressure [J].
Estebe, JP ;
Le Naoures, A ;
Chemaly, L ;
Ecoffey, C .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (01) :21-26
[10]  
FEI, 2016, DRESS RUL