Sediment and nutrient trapping as a result of a temporary Mississippi River floodplain restoration: The Morganza Spillway during the 2011 Mississippi River Flood

被引:16
|
作者
Kroes, Daniel E. [1 ]
Schenk, Edward R. [2 ,3 ]
Noe, Gregory B. [2 ]
Benthem, Adam J. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Louisiana Water Sci Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70817 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Natl Res Program, Reston, VA 20164 USA
[3] Natl Pk Serv, Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 USA
关键词
Floodplain restoration; Nutrient deposition; Sediment deposition; 2011; Flood; Atchafalaya River; Mississippi River; DEPOSITION; BASIN; NITROGEN; RETENTION; PATTERNS; WETLANDS; CONNECTIVITY; DYNAMICS; DELTA; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.056
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The 2011 Mississippi River Flood resulted in the opening of the Morganza Spillway for the second time since its construction in 1954 releasing 7.6 km(3) of water through agricultural and forested lands in the Morganza Floodway and into the Atchafalaya River Basin. This volume, released over 54 days, represented 5.5% of the Mississippi River (M.R.) discharge and 14% of the total discharge through the Atchafalaya River Basin (A.R.B.) during the Spillway operation and 1.1% of the M.R. and 3.3% of the A.R.B. 2011 water year discharge. During the release, 1.03 teragrams (Tg) of sediment was deposited on the Morganza Forebay and Floodway and 0.26 Tg was eroded from behind the Spillway structure. The majority of deposition (86 %) occurred in the Forebay (upstream of the structure) and within 4 km downstream of the Spillway structure with minor deposition on the rest of the Floodway. There was a net deposition of 26 x 10(-4) Tg of N and 5.36 x 10(-4) Tg of P, during the diversion, that was equivalent to 0.17% N and 0.33% P of the 2011 annual M.R. load. Median deposited sediment particle size at the start of the Forebay was 13 mm and decreased to 2 mm 15 km downstream of the Spillway structure. Minimal accretion was found greater than 4 km downstream of the structure suggesting the potential for greater sediment and nutrient trapping in the Floodway. However, because of the large areas involved, substantial sediment mass was deposited even at distances greater than 30 km. Sediment and nutrient deposition on the Morganza Floodway was limited because suspended sediment was quickly deposited along the flowpath and not refreshed by incremental water exchanges between the Atchafalaya River (A.R.) and the Floodway. Sediment and nutrient trapping could have been greater and more evenly distributed if additional locations of hydraulic input from and outputs to the A.R. (connectivity) were added. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 102
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Floodplain Vulnerability during Extreme Mississippi River Flood 2011
    Goodwell, Allison E.
    Zhu, Zhenduo
    Dutta, Debsunder
    Greenberg, Jonathan A.
    Kumar, Praveen
    Garcia, Marcelo H.
    Rhoads, Bruce L.
    Holmes, Robert R.
    Parker, Gary
    Berretta, David P.
    Jacobson, Robert B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (05) : 2619 - 2625
  • [2] Floodplain biogeochemical processing of floodwaters in the Atchafalaya River Basin during the Mississippi River flood of 2011
    Scott, Durelle T.
    Keim, Richard F.
    Edwards, Brandon L.
    Jones, C. Nathan
    Kroes, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 119 (04) : 537 - 546
  • [3] Sediment Trapping by Emerged Channel Bars in the Lowermost Mississippi River during a Major Flood
    Wang, Bo
    Xu, Y. Jun
    WATER, 2015, 7 (11): : 6079 - 6096
  • [4] Sediment and Nutrient Tradeoffs in Restoring Mississippi River Delta: Restoration vs Eutrophication
    Twilley, Robert
    Rivera-Monroy, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2009, 141 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [5] Temporary connectivity: the relative benefits of large river floodplain inundation in the lower Mississippi River
    Phelps, Quinton E.
    Tripp, Sara J.
    Herzog, David P.
    Garvey, James E.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 23 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [6] Mississippi River channel response to the Bonnet Carre Spillway opening in the 2011 flood and its implications for the design and operation of river diversions
    Allison, Mead A.
    Vosburg, Brian M.
    Ramirez, Michael T.
    Meselhe, Ehab A.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 477 : 104 - 118
  • [7] Patterns of forest succession and impacts of flood in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain ecosystem
    Yin, Yao
    Wu, Yegang
    Bartell, Steve M.
    Cosgriff, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2009, 6 (04) : 463 - 472
  • [8] Floodplain sedimentation and sensitivity: Summer 1993 flood, upper Mississippi River valley
    Gomez, B
    Phillips, JD
    Magilligan, FJ
    James, LA
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 1997, 22 (10) : 923 - 936
  • [9] FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING FOR INTEGRATED FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM
    Theiling, C. H.
    Burant, J. T.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 29 (08) : 961 - 978
  • [10] Human modifications to the sediment regime of the Lower Mississippi River flood plain
    Kesel, RH
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (3-4) : 325 - 334