Object-based classification of land cover and tree species by integrating airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution imagery data

被引:64
作者
Sasaki, Takeshi [1 ]
Imanishi, Junichi [2 ]
Ioki, Keiko [1 ]
Morimoto, Yukihiro [2 ]
Kitada, Katsunori [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Global Environm Studies, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[3] Nakanihon Air Serv Co Ltd, Toyoyama, Aichi 4800202, Japan
关键词
Object-based methods; Laser scanner; Warm-temperate forest; Decision tree; Land cover classification; Tree species classification; LEAF-AREA INDEX; REMOTE-SENSING DATA; PHOTOGRAPHY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11355-011-0158-z
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We evaluated the effectiveness of integrating discrete return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data with high spatial resolution near-infrared digital imagery for object-based classification of land cover types and dominant tree species. In particular we adopted LiDAR ratio features based on pulse attributes that have not been used in past studies. Object-based classifications were performed first on land cover types, and subsequently on dominant tree species within the area classified as trees. In each classification stage, two different data combinations were examined: LiDAR data integrated with digital imagery or digital imagery only. We created basic image objects and calculated a number of spectral, textural, and LiDAR-based features for each image object. Decision tree analysis was performed and important features were investigated in each classification. In the land cover classification, the overall accuracy was improved to 0.975 when using the object-based method and integrating LiDAR data. The mean height value derived from the LiDAR data was effective in separating "trees" and "lawn" objects having different height. As for the tree species classification, the overall accuracy was also improved by object-based classification with LiDAR data although it remained up to 0.484 because spectral and textural signatures were similar among tree species. We revealed that the LiDAR ratio features associated with laser penetration proportion were important in the object-based classification as they can distinguish tree species having different canopy density. We concluded that integrating LiDAR data was effective in the object-based classifications of land cover and dominant tree species.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 171
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DEF PROF 5 REF BOOK
[2]   Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information [J].
Benz, UC ;
Hofmann, P ;
Willhauck, G ;
Lingenfelder, I ;
Heynen, M .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 58 (3-4) :239-258
[3]   Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces [J].
Brennan, R. ;
Webster, T. L. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 32 (02) :162-172
[4]   Exploitation of very high resolution satellite data for tree species identification [J].
Carleer, A ;
Wolff, E .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 70 (01) :135-140
[5]   On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index [J].
Carlson, TN ;
Ripley, DA .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 62 (03) :241-252
[6]   Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using landsat TM images [J].
Chen, JM ;
Cihlar, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 55 (02) :153-162
[7]   Object-based analysis of Ikonos-2 imagery for extraction of forest inventory parameters [J].
Chubey, MS ;
Franklin, SE ;
Wulder, MA .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 72 (04) :383-394
[8]   Classification of the wildland-urban interface: A comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography [J].
Cleve, Casey ;
Kelly, Maggi ;
Kearns, Faith R. ;
Morltz, Max .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2008, 32 (04) :317-326
[9]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[10]  
Definiens, 2006, DEF PROF 5 US GUID