Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model

被引:343
作者
Bartlett, Jonathan W. [1 ]
Seaman, Shaun R. [2 ]
White, Ian R. [2 ]
Carpenter, James R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] MRC Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
multiple imputation; compatibility; non-linearities; interactions; rejection sampling; fully conditional specification; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/0962280214521348
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Missing covariate data commonly occur in epidemiological and clinical research, and are often dealt with using multiple imputation. Imputation of partially observed covariates is complicated if the substantive model is non-linear (e.g. Cox proportional hazards model), or contains non-linear (e.g. squared) or interaction terms, and standard software implementations of multiple imputation may impute covariates from models that are incompatible with such substantive models. We show how imputation by fully conditional specification, a popular approach for performing multiple imputation, can be modified so that covariates are imputed from models which are compatible with the substantive model. We investigate through simulation the performance of this proposal, and compare it with existing approaches. Simulation results suggest our proposal gives consistent estimates for a range of common substantive models, including models which contain non-linear covariate effects or interactions, provided data are missing at random and the assumed imputation models are correctly specified and mutually compatible. Stata software implementing the approach is freely available.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 487
页数:26
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J R STAT SOC A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MULTIPLE IMPUTATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], JOINT MODEL IN PRESS
[4]   COMPATIBLE CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
ARNOLD, BC ;
PRESS, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 84 (405) :152-156
[5]   A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures [J].
Collins, LM ;
Schafer, JL ;
Kam, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 6 (04) :330-351
[6]  
Gelman Andrew, 2004, Bayesian data analysis, V2nd
[7]   Monte Carlo EM for missing covariates in parametric regression models [J].
Ibrahim, JG ;
Chen, MH ;
Lipsitz, SR .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (02) :591-596
[8]   Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease [J].
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Wiste, Heather J. ;
Vemuri, Prashanthi ;
Weigand, Stephen D. ;
Senjem, Matthew L. ;
Zeng, Guang ;
Bernstein, Matt A. ;
Gunter, Jeffrey L. ;
Pankratz, Vernon S. ;
Aisen, Paul S. ;
Weiner, Michael W. ;
Petersen, Ronald C. ;
Shaw, Leslie M. ;
Trojanowski, John Q. ;
Knopman, David S. .
BRAIN, 2010, 133 :3336-3348
[9]   Multiple imputation: current perspectives [J].
Kenward, Michael G. ;
Carpenter, James .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (03) :199-218
[10]   REGRESSION WITH MISSING XS - A REVIEW [J].
LITTLE, RJA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 87 (420) :1227-1237