Effects of Lime and Phosphorus Application on Phosphorus Runoff Risk

被引:14
作者
Murphy, Paul N. C. [1 ]
Sims, J. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Environm Res Ctr, Agr Catchments Programme, Johnstown Castle, County Wexford, Ireland
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Phosphorus; Lime; Phosphorus source measure; Phosphorus loss in runoff; Organic phosphorus; Soil pH; ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS; SOILS; LOSSES; CHALLENGES; PHOSPHATE; MEHLICH-3; RELEASE; GYPSUM;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-012-1293-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Lime was investigated as a soil amendment to decrease phosphorus (P) loss in runoff from two Delaware sandy loam soils, one high and one low in P. Soils were limed at three rates (control and target pH values of 6 and 6.8, respectively), packed into runoff boxes (2,000 cm(2)) and received simulated rainfall (80 mm h(-1) for 30 min). Lime showed potential to decrease P loss in runoff, but its effectiveness was soil specific and dependant on other management factors also. Lime decreased dissolved reactive P (DRP) and dissolved organic P (DOP) loss by 20-25 and 52-93 %, respectively, for the high-P soil and particulate P (PP) by 13 % for the low-P soil. The majority of P lost in runoff was DOP (3-29 %) or PP (64-96 %). Lime increased PP losses from the finer-textured soil following P application, indicating that increased P sorption can lead to increased losses if P is sorbed to more erodable particles. Initial soil P status was more important than liming in determining P loss. While amendments may decrease P losses in the short term, addressing nutrient imbalances at the field scale is clearly necessary in the long term. Losses increased significantly following inorganic P application. Although P was sorbed rapidly, with less than 2 % of added P removed in runoff, mean concentrations in excess of 700 mu g l(-1) DRP, 2,500 mu g l(-1) OP and 6,500 mu g l(-1) PP were recorded for both soils immediately following P application.
引用
收藏
页码:5459 / 5471
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Avery B.W., 1974, SOIL SURVEY TECHNICA, V6
[2]   Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture [J].
Boesch, DF ;
Brinsfield, RB ;
Magnien, RE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) :303-320
[3]   Phosphorus retention by the ap horizon of a spodosol as influenced by calcium amendments [J].
Boruvka, L ;
Rechcigl, JE .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2003, 168 (10) :699-706
[4]   Assessing the efficacy of alternative phosphorus sorbing soil amendments [J].
Callahan, MP ;
Kleinman, PJA ;
Sharpley, AN ;
Stout, WL .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2002, 167 (08) :539-547
[5]   Using gypsum to reduce phosphorus in runoff from subcatchments in South Australia [J].
Cox, JW ;
Varcoe, J ;
Chittleborough, DJ ;
van Leeuwen, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2005, 34 (06) :2118-2128
[6]   Lime-induced changes in indices of soil phosphate availability [J].
Curtin, D ;
Syers, JK .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (01) :147-152
[7]  
Eckert D., 1995, Recommended soil pH and Lime Requirement tests
[8]  
HANNAPEL R. J., 1964, SOIL SCI, V97, P421, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196406000-00009
[9]   Transfer of phosphorus from agricultural soils [J].
Haygarth, PM ;
Jarvis, SC .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 66, 1999, 66 :195-249
[10]   Effect of Coal Combustion By-products on Phosphorus Runoff from a Coastal Plain Soil [J].
Johnson, Keisha N. ;
Allen, Arthur L. ;
Kleinman, Peter J. A. ;
Hashem, Fawzy M. ;
Sharpley, Andrew N. ;
Stout, William L. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2011, 42 (07) :778-789