Is It Valid to Calculate the 3-Kilohertz Threshold by Averaging 2 and 4 Kilohertz?

被引:89
作者
Gurgel, Richard K. [1 ]
Popelka, Gerald R. [1 ]
Oghalai, John S. [1 ]
Blevins, Nikolas H. [1 ]
Chang, Kay W. [1 ]
Jackler, Robert K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
audiogram; hearing; otolaryngology; acoustic neuroma; conductive hearing loss; Meniere disease; ototoxicity; hearing disability; EQUILIBRIUM GUIDELINES; COMMITTEE; HEARING;
D O I
10.1177/0194599812437156
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Many guidelines for reporting hearing results use the threshold at 3 kilohertz (kHz), a frequency not measured routinely. This study assessed the validity of estimating the missing 3-kHz threshold by averaging the measured thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz. The estimated threshold was compared to the measured threshold at 3 kHz individually and when used in the pure-tone average (PTA) of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz in audiometric data from 2170 patients. The difference between the estimated and measured thresholds for 3 kHz was within +/- 5 dB in 72% of audiograms, +/- 10 dB in 91%, and within +/- 20 dB in 99% (correlation coefficient r = 0.965). The difference between the PTA threshold using the estimated threshold compared with using the measured threshold at 3 kHz was within +/- 5 dB in 99% of audiograms (r = 0.997). The estimated threshold accurately approximates the measured threshold at 3 kHz, especially when incorporated into the PTA.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 104
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条