Collaborative design process and product knowledge methodology for mechatronic systems

被引:25
作者
Mcharek, Mehdi [1 ]
Hammadi, Moncef [1 ]
Azib, Toufik [2 ]
Larouci, Cherif [2 ]
Choley, Jean-Yves [1 ]
机构
[1] Supmeca, Lab Quartz EA7393, 3 Rue Fernand Hainaut, F-93400 St Ouen, France
[2] Estaca, Estacalab, 12 Ave Paul Delouvrier, F-78180 Montigny Le Bretonneux, France
关键词
Knowledge management; Collaboration; Design process; Systems engineering; Mechatronic systems; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; INTEROPERABILITY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Recent advances in design techniques promote the development of concurrent engineering to reduce the time and cost of the design cycle. This is particularly necessary for mechatronic design which involves several disciplines. But companies have to address challenges associated with collaboration and reuse. The mechatronic design evolves from the system level to the multiple-disciplinary level. This requires that system engineers and disciplinary engineers collaborate closely for an integrated and continuous product development process. However, the heterogeneity of tools used in system level and disciplinary level with the lack of a common knowledge basis creates a gap between them. Thus, the focus of this paper is to develop a knowledge management framework suitable for mechatronic concurrent design and capable to harmonize the overall design cycle. Our contribution lies in structuring knowledge at the system and disciplinary levels to ensure the traceability between them. Our methodology called Collaborative Design Process and Product Knowledge (CDPPK) is detailed with the associated meta-model. A demonstrator is also presented and applied successfully to a collaborative industrial scenario concerning the Electronic Throttle Body (ETB). (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 228
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [51] Petty M.D., 2009, VERIFICATION VALIDAT, P121
  • [52] RASMUS DW, 2002, COLLABORATION CONTEN
  • [53] A decision support for identifying crucial knowledge requiring capitalizing operation
    Saad, Ines
    Chakhar, Salem
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (03) : 889 - 904
  • [54] Sakairi T, 2012, 2012 PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE (SICE), P2011
  • [55] Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Engineered Systems: Report From a National Science Foundation Workshop
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2011, 133 (10)
  • [56] Softic S., 2013, P 13 INT C KNOWL MAN, P36
  • [57] An integration framework for product lifecycle management
    Srinivasan, Vijay
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2011, 43 (05) : 464 - 478
  • [58] Integrating viewpoints in the development of mechatronic products
    Torngren, Martin
    Qamar, Ahsan
    Biehl, Matthias
    Loiret, Frederic
    El-Khoury, Jad
    [J]. MECHATRONICS, 2014, 24 (07) : 745 - 762
  • [59] Challenges in Designing Mechatronic Systems
    Torry-Smith, Jonas Morkeberg
    Qamar, Ahsan
    Achiche, Sofiane
    Wikander, Jan
    Mortensen, Niels Henrik
    During, Carl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2013, 135 (01)
  • [60] Tudorache T., 2006, Employing Ontologies for an Improved Development Process in Collaborative Engineering