Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in rheumatoid arthritis patients

被引:33
作者
Bellamy, N
Campbell, J
Syrotuik, J
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hosp, Dept Med, Ctr Natl Res & Rehabil Med CONROD, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
[3] Searle Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; pain; outcome measurement;
D O I
10.1185/03007999909113372
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although progress has been made in the clinical metrology of pain in rheumatoid arthritis, much further work remains. The preferred methods of measurement remain debatable. In this longitudinal, open study, a comparison of eight self-rating pain scales has been conducted. A total of 124 patients entered the four-week study after completing a 3-7-day NSAID-free washout period. Patients were assigned to treatment with oxaprozin 1200 mg p.o. once daily with titration permitted between 600 mg and 1800 mg. Rescue analgesia with acetaminophen (paracetamol) 325 mg (maximum 2600 mg) was permitted. At the end of the washout and treatment period, patients completed eight self-administered pain rating scales. All pain measures detected clinically important and statistically significant improvements in pain. The pain scales differed in their degree of responsiveness. The Likert and visual analogue scales and their primary variations (continuous chromatic analogue and numerical scales) were more responsive than more complex measures. A positive correlation between initial pain rating and subsequent pain response was confirmed in this study. We conclude that, while pain is a subjective sensory phenomenon, its perceived severity can be evaluated using a variety of self-administered pain scales, all of which are capable of detecting improvements in health status following effective pharmacological intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 127
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT
[2]  
Armitage P, 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, P93
[3]   THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[4]   CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM IN PAIN, STIFFNESS, AND MANUAL DEXTERITY IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - RELATION BETWEEN DISCOMFORT AND DISABILITY [J].
BELLAMY, N ;
SOTHERN, RB ;
CAMPBELL, J ;
BUCHANAN, WW .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1991, 50 (04) :243-248
[5]  
Bellamy N, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P852
[6]  
BELLAMY N, 1993, MUSCULOSKELETAL CLIN, P65
[7]  
BELLAMY N, 1998, IN PRESS J REHUMATOL
[8]   THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES [J].
BIERI, D ;
REEVE, RA ;
CHAMPION, GD ;
ADDICOAT, L ;
ZIEGLER, JB .
PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) :139-150
[9]   AURANOFIN THERAPY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
BOMBARDIER, C ;
WARE, J ;
RUSSELL, IJ ;
LARSON, M ;
CHALMERS, A ;
READ, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 81 (04) :565-578
[10]  
BROWN CR, 1993, DRUG THERAPY S, V23, P31