Method to Develop Health Care Peer Groups for Quality and Financial Comparisons Across Hospitals

被引:24
作者
Byrne, Margaret M. [2 ]
Daw, Christina N. [3 ,4 ]
Nelson, Harlan A. [5 ]
Urech, Tracy H. [3 ,4 ]
Pietz, Kenneth [3 ,4 ]
Petersen, Laura A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Houston Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Hlth Serv Res & Dev 152, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Miami, FL USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston VA Med Ctr, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Excellence, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] InVent Clin Inc, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Peer groups; cluster analysis; nearest neighbor; Euclidean distance; quality of care comparisons; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; COST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00916.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop and explore the characteristics of a novel "nearest neighbor" methodology for creating peer groups for health care facilities. Data were obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) databases. Peer groups are developed by first calculating the multidimensional Euclidean distance between each of 133 VA medical centers based on 16 facility characteristics. Each medical center then serves as the center for its own peer group, and the nearest neighbor facilities in terms of Euclidean distance comprise the peer facilities. We explore the attributes and characteristics of the nearest neighbor peer groupings. In addition, we construct standard cluster analysis-derived peer groups and compare the characteristics of groupings from the two methodologies. The novel peer group methodology presented here results in groups where each medical center is at the center of its own peer group. Possible advantages over other peer group methodologies are that facilities are never on the "edge" of a group and group size-and thus group dispersion-is determined by the researcher. Peer groups with these characteristics may be more appealing to some researchers and administrators than standard cluster analysis and may thus strengthen organizational buy-in for financial and quality comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 592
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ALEXANDER JA, 1984, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V21, P303
  • [2] [Anonymous], PERF ASS TOOL QUAL I
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Health Indicators
  • [4] ASH AS, 2003, RISK ADJUSTMENT MEAS, P297
  • [5] Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cards
    Austin, PC
    Alter, DA
    Anderson, GM
    Tu, JV
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 148 (06) : 1041 - 1046
  • [6] Effect of using information from only one system for dually eligible health care users
    Byrne, Margaret M.
    Kuebeler, Mark
    Pietz, Kenneth
    Petersen, Laura A.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (08) : 768 - 773
  • [7] Performance of the '100 top hospitals': What does the report card report?
    Chen, J
    Radford, MJ
    Wang, Y
    Marciniak, TA
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1999, 18 (04) : 53 - 68
  • [8] *CTR MED MED, COMP HOSP
  • [9] INSURANCE PRINCIPLES AND THE DESIGN OF PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS
    ELLIS, RP
    MCGUIRE, TG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1988, 7 (03) : 215 - 237
  • [10] Hogan AJ, 2000, HEALTH ECON, V9, P715, DOI 10.1002/1099-1050(200012)9:8<715::AID-HEC573>3.3.CO