A Comparison of Outcomes and Prognostic Features for Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast and Other Radiation-Associated Sarcomas

被引:32
作者
Mito, Jeffrey K. [1 ]
Mitra, Devarati [2 ]
Barysauskas, Constance M. [3 ]
Marino-Enriquez, Adrian [1 ]
Morgan, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Fletcher, Christopher D. M. [1 ]
Raut, Chandrajit P. [4 ,5 ]
Baldini, Elizabeth H. [2 ]
Doyle, Leona A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2019年 / 104卷 / 02期
关键词
SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION; THERAPY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.082
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Radiation-associated sarcomas (RAS) are considered to have a poor prognosis. Although the incidence is anticipated to rise, contemporary data regarding predictors of outcomes are few. We performed a retrospective analysis to identify RAS prognostic factors and subset analyses for radiation-associated angiosarcoma arising after treatment for breast cancer (RAAB) and other RAS subtypes (other-RAS). Methods and Materials: Patients with localized RAS evaluated at an institutional multidisciplinary sarcoma clinic were identified. Clinical and histologic review was performed, and outcomes were assessed to identify prognostic features. A subset of cases underwent molecular analysis by next-generation sequencing. Results: Among 176 patients, histologic subtypes of RAS included angiosarcoma (41%), undifferentiated/unclassified sarcoma (40%), leiomyosarcoma (8%), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (6%), and osteosarcoma (2%). Sixty-seven patients (38%) had RAAB, and 109 (62%) had other-RAS. RAAB had significantly shorter latency from time of initial radiation compared with other-RAS (8 vs. 15 years; P < .001). Treatment approaches included surgery (91%), chemotherapy (44%), and radiation therapy (27%). Median follow-up was 3.2 years; 3-year overall survival (OS) was 74%. On multivariate analysis, positive margins (P < .0001), deep tumor location (intrathoracic/intra-abdominal, P = .002), and high grade (P < .0001) were associated with worse OS. In particular, 3-year OS with negative versus positive margins was 90% versus 66%. Patients with RAAB versus other-RAS showed a trend for higher 3-year OS (84% vs 68%; P = .09), significantly higher 3-year metastasis-free survival (82% vs 67%; P = .001), but similar 3-year local recurrence-free survival (54% vs 61%; P = .28). Next-generation sequencing identified overall low tumor mutational burden, recurrent MYC amplification in RAAB, and few clinically actionable mutations. Conclusions: Margin negative excision, superficial tumor location, and low tumor grade are determinants of improved OS for RAS, suggesting that complete surgical excision, when possible, is an optimal component of treatment. RAAB is a clinicopathologically distinct type of RAS with shorter latency from initial RT, different recurrence patterns, and when aggressively managed has potentially better outcomes compared with other-RAS. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 435
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies
    Behjati, Sam
    Gundem, Gunes
    Wedge, David C.
    Roberts, Nicola D.
    Tarpey, Patrick S.
    Cooke, Susanna L.
    Van Loo, Peter
    Alexandrov, Ludmil B.
    Ramakrishna, Manasa
    Davies, Helen
    Nik-Zainal, Serena
    Hardy, Claire
    Latimer, Calli
    Raine, Keiran M.
    Stebbings, Lucy
    Menzies, Andy
    Jones, David
    Shepherd, Rebecca
    Butler, Adam P.
    Teague, Jon W.
    Jorgensen, Mette
    Khatri, Bhavisha
    Pillay, Nischalan
    Shlien, Adam
    Futreal, P. Andrew
    Badie, Christophe
    McDermott, Ultan
    Bova, G. Steven
    Richardson, Andrea L.
    Flanagan, Adrienne M.
    Stratton, Michael R.
    Campbell, Peter J.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
  • [2] Radiation-induced sarcoma: 25-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital
    Bjerkehagen, Bodil
    Smeland, Sigbjorn
    Walberg, Lise
    Skjeldal, Sigmund
    Hall, Kirsten Sundby
    Nesland, Jahn M.
    Smastuen, Milada Cvancarova
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Saeter, Gunnar
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (08) : 1475 - 1482
  • [3] Trends in Radiation Therapy among Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2000-2030
    Bryant, Alex K.
    Banegas, Matthew P.
    Martinez, Maria Elena
    Mell, Loren K.
    Murphy, James D.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (06) : 963 - 970
  • [4] CAHAN WG, 1948, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V1, P3, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(194805)1:1<3::AID-CNCR2820010103>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-7
  • [6] Long-term results with resection of radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas
    Cha, C
    Antonescu, CR
    Quan, ML
    Maru, S
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (06) : 903 - 909
  • [7] Outcomes of a Large Single Institutional Series of Radiation Associated Sarcomas
    Chen, Y. L.
    Wang, H.
    Miao, R.
    Jacobson, A.
    Choy, E.
    Cote, G.
    Hornicek, F. J.
    DeLaney, T. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S79 - S79
  • [8] Coindre JM, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P1914, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010515)91:10<1914::AID-CNCR1214>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-3
  • [10] RADIATION-INDUCED SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA
    DAVIDSON, T
    WESTBURY, G
    HARMER, CL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (04) : 308 - 309