Examination of the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Prospective Chemistry Teachers in terms of Different Variables (The Sample of Dokuz Eylul University)

被引:0
作者
Akkuzu, Nalan [1 ]
Akcay, Husamettin [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Buca Educ Fac, Dept Chem Educ, TR-35150 Buca Izmir, Turkey
来源
KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI | 2012年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
Self-efficacy; Confirmatory Factor Analysis; Prospective Teacher; Demographic Features; SCIENCE; CONSTRUCT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research was conducted to adapt the chemistry self efficacy belief (CSEB) scale using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFI) and to examine pre service teachers CSEB in terms of some demographic features. This descriptive study was carried out Dokuz Eylul University in 2008-2010 academic years. Firstly, for validity and reliability, the scale was administered to 123 prospective chemistry teachers. In order to determine CSEB according to some variables which are gender. class level, type of high school, and giving lecture, the scale was implemented 116 prospective chemistry teachers. LISREL 8,71 and SPSS statistical programs were utilized to analyze the collected data. It was confirmed whether CSEB scale has two factors or not by calculating fit indexes. Independent and ANOVA t-tests were used to outline if there was a significant difference between self efficacies of prospective teachers according to gender, class level, type of high school and giving lecture. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that fit indexes values were found high and verified structure of the scale with two factors. According to the results of second research question, there was no significant difference between gender and class levels, but there was a significant difference between type of high school in favor of Anatolian teacher high school.
引用
收藏
页码:2208 / 2216
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [41] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives
    Hu, Li-tze
    Bentler, Peter M.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) : 1 - 55
  • [42] Isler I., 2008, THESIS MIDDLE E TU A
  • [43] Joreskog K. G., 1993, LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language
  • [44] Kahyaoglu M., 2007, Kastamonu Education Journal, V15, P73
  • [45] Kayis A., 2006, SPSS uygulamal ok deikenli istatistik teknikleri SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques, P403
  • [46] Kelloway KE, 1989, Using Lisrel for Structural Equation Modeling: A researcher's Guide
  • [47] COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES - ATTITUDES AND SELF-EFFICACY ACROSS UNDERGRADUATE DISCIPLINES
    KINZIE, MB
    DELCOURT, MAB
    POWERS, SM
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 35 (06) : 745 - 768
  • [48] Kucukyilmaz A., 2006, YUZUNCU YIL U J FACU, V2, P1
  • [49] Lei P-W., 2007, Educ Meas -Issues Pract, V26, P33, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2007.00099.X]
  • [50] Maruyama G., 1998, BASICS STRUCTURAL EQ