Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part I: Ozone

被引:35
|
作者
Thunis, P. [1 ]
Pernigotti, D. [1 ]
Gerboles, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, JRC, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Climate Change & Air Qual Unit, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
Model evaluation; Measurement uncertainty; Air quality modeling; GUM; CHEMILUMINESCENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since models are increasingly used for policy support their evaluation is becoming an important issue. One of the possible evaluations is to compare model results to measurements. Statistical performance indicators then provide insight on model performance but do not tell whether model results have reached a sufficient level of quality for a given application. In a previous work Thunis et al. (2012, referred to as T2012) proposed a Model Quality Objective (MQO) based on the root mean square error between measured and modeled concentrations divided by the measurement uncertainty. In 12012 the measurement uncertainty was assumed to remain constant regardless of the concentration level. In the current work this assumption is overcome by quantifying all possible sources of uncertainty for the particular case of O-3. Based on these uncertainty source quantifications, a simple relationship is proposed to formulate the measurement uncertainty which is then used to update the MQO and Model Performance Criteria (MPC) proposed in T2012 with more accurate values. The MQO and MPC calculated based on the European monitoring network AIRBASE data provide insight on the expected model results quality for a given application, depending on the geographical area and station type. These station specific MQOs and MPCs have the main advantage of relating expected model performances to the underlying measurement uncertainties. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 868
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part II: NO2 and PM10
    Pernigotti, D.
    Gerboles, M.
    Belis, C. A.
    Thunis, P.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 79 : 869 - 878
  • [2] Using Stochastically Perturbed Parameterizations to Represent Model Uncertainty. Part I: Implementation and Parameter Sensitivity
    McTaggart-Cowan, Ron
    Separovic, Leo
    Aider, Rabah
    Charron, Martin
    Desgagne, Michel
    Houtekamer, Pieter L.
    Paquin-Ricard, Danahe
    Vaillancourt, Paul A.
    Zadra, Ayrton
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2022, 150 (11) : 2829 - 2858
  • [4] A computational framework for risk-based power systems operations under uncertainty. Part I: Theory
    Hamon, Camille
    Perninge, Magnus
    Soder, Lennart
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2015, 119 : 45 - 53
  • [5] Impact of Measurement Protocol on ICP-MS Data Quality Objectives: Part I
    Thomas, Robert
    SPECTROSCOPY, 2021, 36 (10) : 20 - 29
  • [6] Adolescent quality of life, Part I: conceptual and measurement model
    Edwards, TC
    Huebner, CE
    Connell, FA
    Patrick, DL
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2002, 25 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [7] Review of Uncertainty Quantification of Measurement and Computational Modeling in EMC Part I: Measurement Uncertainty
    Carobbi, Carlo F. M.
    Lallechere, Sebastien
    Arnaut, Luk R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2019, 61 (06) : 1690 - 1698
  • [8] Control of resource-intensive computations under uncertainty. I. Multiparametric model
    Malashenko, Yu E.
    Nazarova, I. A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 53 (04) : 497 - 510
  • [9] Control of resource-intensive computations under uncertainty. I. Multiparametric model
    Yu. E. Malashenko
    I. A. Nazarova
    Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2014, 53 : 497 - 510
  • [10] Improved genetic algorithms for deterministic optimization and optimization under uncertainty. Part I. Algorithms development
    Diwekar, UM
    Xu, W
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (18) : 7132 - 7137