Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study

被引:3
作者
Pils, Sophie [1 ]
Springer, Stephanie [2 ]
Seemann, Rudolf [3 ]
Wehrmann, Verena [1 ]
Worda, Christof [2 ]
Ott, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Div Gynecol Endocrinol & Reprod Med, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Div Obstet & Fetomaternal Med, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Craniomaxillofacial & Oral Surg, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Fetal weight; Birth weight; Multiple pregnancy; Triplet pregnancy; Ultrasound; CERVICAL LENGTH; MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES; PRETERM BIRTH; ULTRASOUND; ACCURACY; PREDICTION; RISK; SEX;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. Methods Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock's and Schild's formulas was compared to actual birth weight in a tertiary-care center in Vienna, Austria. Statistical analyses were performed using a stepwise linear regression model and crosstabs. Results The median discrepancy between the sonographically estimated fetal weight by Hadlock's formula and the actual birth weight was 106 g (IQR 56-190). The percentage error and its standard deviation were - 2.5 +12.1%, and the median percentage error was - 3.6%. Concerning the use of Hadlock's formula, estimated fetal weight was the most important factor predictive of actual birth weight with an estimate of 0.920 (p < 0.001). Female neonates had been overestimated by a mean of 50.473 g per fetus. The sonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates was significantly reliable (p < 0.001), with positive and negative predictive values ranging from 81.3 to 100.0%. Similar results were obtained for Schild's formula. Conclusion Even if sonographically estimated fetal weight in triplet pregnancies has a high overall accuracy of fetal weight estimation, there are some limitations in prediction of intrauterine growth restrictions, especially in female fetuses.
引用
收藏
页码:1441 / 1447
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V123, P1118, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446856.51061.3e
[2]  
Bagchi S, 2006, J Obstet Gynaecol, V26, P291
[3]   A search for the most accurate formula for sonographic weight estimation by fetal sex - a retrospective cohort study [J].
Barel, O. ;
Maymon, R. ;
Barak, U. ;
Smorgick, N. ;
Tovbin, J. ;
Vaknin, Z. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (13) :1337-1344
[4]   Birthweight discordance in multiple pregnancy [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Kalish, RB .
TWIN RESEARCH, 2003, 6 (06) :526-531
[5]   Outcome of triplets and high-order multiple pregnancies [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Keith, LG .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (02) :113-117
[6]  
Blickstein Isaac, 2002, Semin Neonatol, V7, P177, DOI 10.1053/siny.2002.0105
[7]   Maternal and neonatal outcome in triplet, quadruplet and quintuplet gestations following ART: a 11-year study [J].
Chibber, Rachana ;
Fouda, Mohamed ;
Shishtawy, Wael ;
Al-Dossary, Mariam ;
Al-Hijji, Jassim ;
Amen, Ali ;
Mohammed, Asiya Tasneem .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 288 (04) :759-767
[8]   Prediction of Time to Delivery Week-by-Week in Women with a Triplet Pregnancy [J].
de Mheen, L. van ;
Ravelli, A. C. ;
Oudijk, M. A. ;
Bijvank, S. Nij ;
Porath, M. M. ;
Duvekot, J. J. ;
Scholtenhuis, M. A. G. Holswilder-Olde ;
Bloemenkamp, K. W. M. ;
Scheepers, H. C. J. ;
Woiski, M. ;
van Pampus, M. G. ;
de Groot, C. J. ;
Pajkrt, E. ;
Mol, B. W. J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 33 (14) :1394-1400
[9]  
Dudley NY, 2017, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V50, P442
[10]   Ultrasound assessment of the prognosis in triplet pregnancies [J].
Guilherme, Romain ;
Le Ray, Camille ;
Vuillard, Edith ;
Garel, Catherine ;
Delezoide, Anne-Lise ;
Oury, Jean-Francois ;
Luton, Dominique .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (04) :386-390