An Integrated Framework for Risk Response Planning Under Resource Constraints in Large Engineering Projects

被引:61
作者
Fang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Marle, Franck [3 ]
Xie, Min [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Ecole Cent Paris, Lab Genie Ind, F-92290 Chatenay Malabry, France
[4] Ecole Cent Paris, Chair Syst Sci & Energet Challenge, European Fdn New Energy Elect France, F-92290 Chatenay Malabry, France
[5] Supelec, F-91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[6] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, I-22100 Como, Italy
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Complexity; design structure matrix (DSM); genetic algorithm (GA); project management; resource constraints; risk response planning; GENETIC ALGORITHM; DESIGN; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; FAULT; ARCHITECTURE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2013.2242078
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Engineering project managers often face a challenge to allocate tight resources for managing interdependent risks. In this paper, a quantitative framework of analysis for supporting decision making in project risk response planning is developed and studied. The design structure matrix representation is used to capture risk interactions and build a risk propagation model for predicting the global mitigation effects of risk response actions. For exemplification, a genetic algorithm is used as a tool for choosing response actions and allocating budget reserves. An application to a real transportation construction project is also presented. Comparison with a sequential forward selection greedy algorithm shows the superiority of the genetic algorithm search for optimal solutions, and its flexibility for balancing mitigation effects and required budget.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 639
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   A review of techniques for risk management in projects [J].
Ahmed, Ammar ;
Kayis, Berman ;
Amornsawadwatana, Sataporn .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (01) :22-36
[2]  
[Anonymous], T SOC AUTOMOTIVE ENG
[3]  
[Anonymous], ELECT J LINEAR ALGEB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, A guide to the project management body of knowledge
[5]  
Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
[6]   A Study of Interactions in the Risk Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems: An Application to Space PSA [J].
Borgonovo, E. ;
Smith, C. L. .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2011, 59 (06) :1461-1476
[7]   An Alternative FMEA Method for Simple and Accurate Ranking of Failure Modes [J].
Bradley, James R. ;
Guerrero, Hector H. .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2011, 42 (03) :743-771
[8]   Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development [J].
Browning, TR ;
Eppinger, SD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2002, 49 (04) :428-442
[9]   Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions [J].
Browning, TR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (03) :292-306
[10]  
Bru R., 1994, ELECTRON T NUMER ANA, V2, P183