Aboveground carbon of community-managed Chirpine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Nepal based on stand types and geographic aspects

被引:8
作者
Pariyar, Shiva [1 ]
Volkova, Liubov [2 ]
Sharma, Ram P. [3 ]
Sunam, Ramesh [4 ]
Weston, Christopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Ind Tourism Forest & Environm, Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, Fac Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Czech Univ Life Sci, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] United Nations Univ, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Allometric equation; Carbon sequestration; Community forest; REDD+; BIODIVERSITY; SEQUESTRATION; BENEFITS; DYNAMICS; STOCK;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.6494
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
On a global scale, about 15.5% of forests are administered through community-based forestry programs that offer the opportunity for enhanced carbon sequestration while maintaining the supply of more traditional goods and services such as cooking fuels, animal fodder and bedding. A challenge in community forest (CF) management is to realize their carbon value without compromising their role in the provision of these traditional goods and services. In this study of CF dominated by Pinus roxburghii in the Phalebas region of Nepal, the impacts of stand composition and geographic aspect on aboveground forest carbon is investigated as a means to optimize CF management for both traditional values and for emerging carbon market values. The aboveground carbon of mixed and monospecific stands of Pinus roxburghii was estimated using a combination of destructive sampling and species-specific allometric equations. On average, monospecific stands contained 106.2 Mg C ha(-1) in aboveground tree biomass, significantly more than mixed stands at 73.1 Mg C ha(-1) (p = 0.022). Similarly, stands growing on northern aspects (northeast 124.8 Mg C ha(-1), northwest 100.9 Mg C ha(-1)) stored significantly more carbon (p = 0.002) than southern aspects (southeast 75.3 Mg C ha(-1), southwest 57.6 Mg C ha(-1)), reflecting the more favorable growing conditions of northern aspects. These results suggest monospecific stands planted on northern aspects may be best suited for management to achieve carbon benefits, whilst mixed-species stands on southern aspects may be better suited for biodiversity conservation and supporting livelihoods. To maintain and increase carbon value, community forestrymay need to implement nutrient return practices to limit the impact of sustained nutrient removals on stand productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation [J].
Persha, Lauren ;
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini .
SCIENCE, 2011, 331 (6024) :1606-1608
[32]   FACTORS AFFECTING THE NUTRIENT STATUS OF FOREST SITES IN A MOUNTAIN WATERSHED IN NEPAL [J].
SCHMIDT, MG ;
SCHREIER, H ;
SHAH, PB .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1993, 44 (03) :417-425
[33]   Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India [J].
Sharma, C. M. ;
Gairola, Sumeet ;
Baduni, N. P. ;
Ghildiyal, S. K. ;
Suyal, Sarvesh .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2011, 36 (04) :701-708
[34]  
Sharma E, 1990, PUBLICATIONS, V47
[35]   Assessment of Carbon Balance in Community Forests in Dolakha, Nepal [J].
Shrestha, Shanti ;
Karky, Bhaskar Singh ;
Gurung, Anup ;
Bista, Rajesh ;
Vetaas, Ole Reidar .
SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2013, 12 (04) :507-517
[36]   Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods [J].
Smith, J ;
Scherr, SJ .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 31 (12) :2143-2160
[37]  
Springate-Baginski O., 2003, Journal of Forest and Livelihood, V3, P5
[38]   Advancing equity in community forestry: recognition of the poor matters [J].
Sunam, R. K. ;
McCarthy, J. F. .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2010, 12 (04) :370-382
[39]   Community Forestry and the Threat of Recentralization in Nepal: Contesting the Bureaucratic Hegemony in Policy Process [J].
Sunam, Ramesh K. ;
Paudel, Naya S. ;
Paudel, Govinda .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (12) :1407-1421
[40]  
Tamrakar P.R., 2000, Biomass and volume tables with species description for community forest Management