Minimally invasive esophagectomy: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization

被引:0
作者
Godiris-Petit, G [1 ]
Munoz-Bongrand, N [1 ]
Honigman, I [1 ]
Cattan, P [1 ]
Sarfati, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ St Louis, APHP, Serv Chirurg Gen Digest & Endocrine, F-75010 Paris, France
来源
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE | 2006年 / 131卷 / 03期
关键词
esophagectomy; laparoscopy; esophageal cancer; morbidity; mortality;
D O I
10.1016/j.anchir.2006.01.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. - Esophagectomy carries high morbidity, mainly due to respiratory complications. In digestive surgery, postoperative outcome is generally improved by minimally invasive surgery. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate feasibility and postoperative outcome of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods. - From July 2001 to June 2004, 20 patients underwent esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) for squamous cell carcinoma (N = 11), adenocarcinoma (N = 7), Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (N = 1), and long peptic stricture (N = 1). Tumours (N = 19) were located on the cardia (N = 5), on the lower third of the oesophagus (N = 10), on the median third (N = 3), and on the upper third (N = 1). Following LGM, transthoracic (N = 19) or transhiatal (N = 1) oesophagectomy was performed. Results. - Complete LGM was achieved in all cases. Mean operative time for LGM was 197 48 minutes. In the 19 patients operated for tumours, IS underwent R0 resection. Eleven patients (55%) developed postoperative complications, mainly (30%) respiratory. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients, with favourable outcome. Pylorospasm (N= 1) was the only intraabdominal complication. One patient died (5%). Conclusion. - Esophagectomy with LGM is feasible with few specific complications. However, no decrease in morbidity could be observed with this technique. Further studies are required to evaluate if thoracoscopy could improve the postoperative course after LGM and to validate oncologic safety of MIE. (c) 2006 Elsevier SAS. Tous droits reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 193
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Techniques and Outcomes [J].
Petropoulos, K. ;
Macheras, A. ;
Liakakos, T. ;
Misiakos, E. P. .
CHIRURGIA, 2015, 110 (02) :99-108
[32]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review [J].
Watanabe, Masayuki ;
Baba, Yoshifumi ;
Nagai, Yohei ;
Baba, Hideo .
SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (03) :237-244
[33]   Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Are There Significant Benefits? [J].
Mungo, Benedetto ;
Molena, Daniela .
CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2014, 2 (07)
[34]   Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy A Review [J].
Murthy, Raghav A. ;
Clarke, Nicholas S. ;
Kernstine, Kemp H., Sr. .
INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 13 (06) :391-403
[35]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma [J].
Predina, Jarrod D. ;
Morse, Christopher R. .
VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6
[36]   Anastomosis after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy [J].
Knickerbocker, Chase ;
Andreoni, Anthony ;
Nieber, Derek ;
Nwafor, Deborah ;
Ben-David, Kfir .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (04) :513-518
[37]   Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy [J].
Gray, Katherine D. ;
Molena, Daniela .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 33 (03) :529-538
[38]   Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Are There Significant Benefits? [J].
Benedetto Mungo ;
Daniela Molena .
Current Surgery Reports, 2 (7)
[39]   Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer? [J].
Qureshi, Irfan ;
Nason, Katie S. ;
Luketich, James D. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (09) :1449-1460
[40]   Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy [J].
David S. Strosberg ;
Robert E. Merritt ;
Kyle A. Perry .
Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 :1371-1375