Biomass Gasification Behavior in an Entrained Flow Reactor: Gas Product Distribution and Soot Formation

被引:93
作者
Qin, Ke [1 ]
Jensen, Peter Arendt [1 ]
Lin, Weigang [1 ]
Jensen, Anker Degn [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Air - Carbon - Dust - Soot - Wood - Residence time distribution - Synthesis gas - Atmospheric movements - Gasification - Pyrolysis - Atmospheric pressure - Oxygen;
D O I
10.1021/ef300960x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biomass gasification and pyrolysis were studied in a laboratory-scale atmospheric pressure entrained flow reactor. Effects of operating parameters and biomass types on the syngas composition were investigated. In general, the carbon conversion during biomass gasification was higher than 90% at the optimal conditions of 1400 degrees C with steam addition. The biomass carbon that was not converted to gas in the gasification process only appeared as soot particles in the syngas in all of the experiments, except for the two experiments performed at 1000 degrees C, where a very small amount of char was also left. In comparison to pyrolysis, lower yields of soot, H-2, and CO were produced during gasification. The yield of soot could be reduced by a longer residence time, larger feeder air flow, lower oxygen concentration, higher excess air ratio, higher steam/carbon ratio, and higher reactor temperature. Changes in residence time, feeder air flow, and oxygen concentration did not show a noticeable influence on H-2 and CO yields. Increasing the excess air ratio decreased both the H-2 and CO yields; increasing the steam/carbon ratio increased the H-2 yield but decreased the CO yield; and increasing the reactor temperature increased both the H-2 and CO yields. Wood, straw, and dried lignin had similar gasification behavior, except with regard to soot formation. The soot yield was lowest during straw gasification possibly because of its high potassium content.
引用
收藏
页码:5992 / 6002
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahrenfeldt J., 2011, PRODUCTION METHANOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INT EN AG WORLD EN O
[3]  
Basu P, 2010, BIOMASS GASIFICATION AND PYROLYSIS: PRACTICAL DESIGN AND THEORY, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374988-8.00001-5
[4]  
Bulewicz E. M., 1975, S INT COMBUST P, V1, P1461
[5]   Biomass pyrolysis/gasification for product gas production: the overall investigation of parametric effects [J].
Chen, G ;
Andries, J ;
Luo, Z ;
Spliethoff, H .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (11) :1875-1884
[6]   Experimental investigation of role of steam in entrained flow coal gasification [J].
Crnomarkovic, Nenad ;
Repic, Branislav ;
Mladenovic, Rastko ;
Neskovic, Olivera ;
Veljkovic, Miomir .
FUEL, 2007, 86 (1-2) :194-202
[7]   Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels [J].
Demirbas, A .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2004, 30 (02) :219-230
[8]   Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples [J].
Demirbas, A .
FUEL, 2001, 80 (13) :1885-1891
[9]  
Drax Group plc, 2012, ANONYMOUSBIOMASS 4 E
[10]   MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PYROLYSIS OF BIOMASS .1. FUNDAMENTALS [J].
EVANS, RJ ;
MILNE, TA .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1987, 1 (02) :123-137