Herd behavior in a laboratory financial market

被引:111
作者
Cipriani, M
Guarino, A
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] UCL, Dept Econ, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] UCL, ELSE, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1257/000282805775014443
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study herd behavior in a laboratory financial market. Subjects receive private information on the fundamental value of an asset and trade it in sequence with a market maker. The market maker updates the asset price according to the history of trades. Theory predicts that agents should never herd. Our experimental results are in line with this prediction. Nevertheless, we observe a phenomenon not accounted for by the theory. In some cases, subjects decide not to use their private information and choose not to trade. In other cases, they ignore their private information to trade against the market (contrarian behavior).
引用
收藏
页码:1427 / 1443
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Anderson LR, 1997, AM ECON REV, V87, P847
[2]  
Avery C, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P724
[3]   A SIMPLE-MODEL OF HERD BEHAVIOR [J].
BANERJEE, AV .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (03) :797-817
[4]   A THEORY OF FADS, FASHION, CUSTOM, AND CULTURAL-CHANGE AS INFORMATIONAL CASCADES [J].
BIKHCHANDANI, S ;
HIRSHLEIFER, D ;
WELCH, I .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (05) :992-1026
[5]   Does order preferencing matter? [J].
Bloomfield, R ;
O'Hara, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 50 (01) :3-37
[6]   Market transparency: Who wins and who loses? [J].
Bloomfield, R ;
O'Hara, M .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1999, 12 (01) :5-35
[7]   Quotes, prices, and estimates in a laboratory market [J].
Bloomfield, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (05) :1791-1808
[8]   Can transparent markets survive? [J].
Bloomfield, R ;
O'Hara, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 55 (03) :425-459
[9]  
Brunnermeier Markus Konrad., 2001, ASSET PRICING ASYMME
[10]   Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory [J].
Çelen, B ;
Kariv, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (03) :484-498