Rich man's solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South

被引:72
作者
Biermann, Frank [1 ]
Moller, Ina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Box 52, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Climate engineering; Least developed countries; Geoengineering; Climate policy; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10784-019-09431-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Numerous recent studies project that climate engineering' technologies might need to play a major role in the future. Such technologies may carry major risks for developing countries that are often especially vulnerable to, and lack adaptive capacity to deal with, the impacts of such new technologies. In this situation, one would expect that developing countriesespecially the least developed countries that are most vulnerableshould play a central role in the emerging discourse on climate engineering. And yet, as this article shows in detail, the discussion about whether and how to engage with these technologies is shaped by experts from just a small set of countries in the Global North. Knowledge production around climate engineering remains heavily dominated by the major research institutions in North America and Europe. Drawing on information from 70 climate engineering events between 2009 and 2017 along with extensive document analysis, the article maps a lack of involvement of developing countries and highlights the degree to which their concerns remain insufficiently represented in politically significant scientific assessment reports. The article concludes by sketching options that developing countries may have to influence the agenda on climate engineering, reflecting on earlier attempts to increase control over novel technologies and influence global agenda setting.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
African Academy of Sciences & Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative, 2013, GOV RES SOL GEOENG A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TRANSF GLOB DEV LDC
[3]  
Antoniades Andreas., 2003, Global Society, V17, P21, DOI [10.1080/0953732032000053980, DOI 10.1080/0953732032000053980]
[4]  
Belter CW, 2013, WILEY INTERDISCIPLIN
[5]  
Beyerl K., 2014, Perspectives on Climate Engineering from Pacific Small Island States
[6]   Institutions for scientific advice: Global environmental assessments and their influence in developing countries [J].
Biermann, F .
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, 2002, 8 (02) :195-219
[7]   Big science, small impacts - in the South? The influence of global environmental assessments on expert communities in India [J].
Biermann, F .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2001, 11 (04) :297-309
[8]   Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene [J].
Biermann, Frank ;
Bai, Xuemei ;
Bondre, Ninad ;
Broadgate, Wendy ;
Chen, Chen-Tung Arthur ;
Dube, Opha Pauline ;
Erisman, Jan Willem ;
Erisman, Jan Willem ;
van der Hel, Sandra ;
Lemos, Maria Carmen ;
Seitzinger, Sybil ;
Seto, Karen C. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 39 :341-350
[9]   Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential [J].
Boysen, Lena R. ;
Lucht, Wolfgang ;
Gerten, Dieter .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (10) :4303-4317
[10]   Conference Diplomacy: The Making of the Paris Agreement [J].
Brun, Aslak .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2016, 4 (03) :115-123