The Effect of Group Attachment and Social Position on Prosocial Behavior. Evidence from Lab-in-the-Field Experiments

被引:63
作者
Baldassarri, Delia [1 ]
Grossman, Guy [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Sociol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Polit Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FOOD-SHARING NETWORKS; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; FAIRNESS; PREFERENCES; RECIPROCITY; COMMITMENT; ALTRUISM; IDENTITY; LAMALERA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0058750
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social life is regulated by norms of fairness that constrain selfish behavior. While a substantial body of scholarship on prosocial behavior has provided evidence of such norms, large inter- and intra-personal variation in prosocial behavior still needs to be explained. The article identifies two social-structural dimensions along which people's generosity varies systematically: group attachment and social position. We conducted lab-in-the-field experiments involving 2,597 members of producer organizations in rural Uganda. Using different variants of the dictator game, we demonstrate that group attachment positively affects prosocial behavior, and that this effect is not simply the by-product of the degree of proximity between individuals. Second, we show that occupying a formal position in an organization or community leads to greater generosity toward in-group members. Taken together, our findings show that prosocial behavior is not an invariant social trait; rather, it varies according to individuals' relative position in the social structure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]   Do strong family ties inhibit trust? [J].
Ermisch, John ;
Gambetta, Diego .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 75 (03) :365-376
[22]  
Fearon JD., 1999, Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139175104
[23]   A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation [J].
Fehr, E ;
Schmidt, KM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (03) :817-868
[24]   Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation [J].
Fowler, James H. ;
Kam, Cindy D. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (03) :813-827
[25]   CENTRALITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION [J].
FREEMAN, LC .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1979, 1 (03) :215-239
[26]  
Gintis H., 2005, Moral sentiments and material interests: the foundations of cooperation in economic life
[27]   The 1/d Law of Giving [J].
Goeree, Jacob K. ;
McConnell, Margaret A. ;
Mitchell, Tiffany ;
Tromp, Tracey ;
Yariv, Leeat .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (01) :183-203
[28]   The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups [J].
Goette, Lorenz ;
Huffman, David ;
Meier, Stephan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) :212-216
[29]   THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES [J].
GRANOVETTER, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 78 (06) :1360-1380
[30]   The Impact of Elections on Cooperation: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Uganda [J].
Grossman, Guy ;
Baldassarri, Delia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (04) :964-985